Background and Purpose: Restoration of cerebrovascular reserve capacity (CVRC) depends on the recruitment and positive outward remodeling of preexistent collaterals (arteriogenesis). With this study, we provide functional evidence that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) augments therapeutic arteriogenesis in two animal models of cerebral hypoperfusion. We identified an effective dosing regimen that improved CVRC and stimulated collateral growth, thereby improving the outcome after experimentally induced stroke. Methods: We used two established animal models of (a) cerebral hypoperfusion (mouse, common carotid artery ligation) and (b) cerebral arteriogenesis (rat, 3-vessel occlusion). Following therapeutic dose determination, both models received either G-CSF, 40 µg/kg every other day, or vehicle for 1 week. Collateral vessel diameters were measured following latex angiography. Cerebrovascular reserve capacities were assessed after acetazolamide stimulation. Mice with left common carotid artery occlusion (CCAO) were additionally subjected to middle cerebral artery occlusion, and stroke volumes were assessed after triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Given the vital role of monocytes in arteriogenesis, we assessed (a) the influence of G-CSF on monocyte migration in vitro and (b) monocyte counts in the adventitial tissues of the growing collaterals in vivo. Results: CVRC was impaired in both animal models 1 week after induction of hypoperfusion. While G-CSF, 40 µg/kg every other day, significantly augmented cerebral arteriogenesis in the rat model, 50 or 150 µg/kg every day did not show any noticeable therapeutic impact. G-CSF restored CVRC in mice (5 ± 2 to 12 ± 6%) and rats (3 ± 4 to 19 ± 12%). Vessel diameters changed accordingly: in rats, the diameters of posterior cerebral arteries (ipsilateral: 209 ± 7–271 ± 57 µm; contralateral: 208 ± 11–252 ± 28 µm) and in mice the diameter of anterior cerebral arteries (185 ± 15–222 ± 12 µm) significantly increased in the G-CSF groups compared to controls. Stroke volume in mice (10 ± 2%) was diminished following CCAO (7 ± 4%) and G-CSF treatment (4 ± 2%). G-CSF significantly increased monocyte migration in vitro and perivascular monocyte numbers in vivo. Conclusion: G-CSF augments cerebral collateral artery growth, increases CVRC and protects from experimentally induced ischemic stroke. When comparing three different dosing regimens, a relatively low dosage of G-CSF was most effective, indicating that the common side effects of this cytokine might be significantly reduced or possibly even avoided in this indication.

This study investigated the effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel, standardly used in the secondary prevention of vascular occlusions, on cerebral arteriogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Cerebral hypoperfusion was induced by three-vessel occlusion (3-VO) in rats, which subsequently received vehicle, ASA (6.34 mg/kg), or clopidogrel (10 mg/kg). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), which enhanced monocyte migration in an additional cell culture model, augmented cerebrovascular arteriogenesis in subgroups (40 lg/kg). Cerebrovascular reactivity and vessel diameters were assessed at 7 and 21 days. Cerebrovascular reserve capacity was completely abolished after 3-VO and remained severely compromised after 7 (À14 ± 14%) and 21 (À5 ± 11%) days in the ASA groups in comparison with controls (4 ± 5% and 10 ± 10%) and clopidogrel (4 ± 13% and 10 ± 8%). It was still significantly decreased when ASA was combined with G-CSF (1 ± 4%) compared with G-CSF alone (20 ± 8%). Posterior cerebral artery diameters confirmed these data. Monocyte migration into the vessel wall, improved by G-CSF, was significantly reduced by ASA. Acetylsalicylic acid, but not clopidogrel, inhibits therapeutically augmented cerebral arteriogenesis.

Pharmacologic PPARγ stimulation inhibits pro-arteriogenic EC activation, monocyte function, SMC proliferation and thus adaptive as well as G-CSF-induced cerebral arteriogenesis. Further studies should evaluate whether this effect may underlie the CV risk associated with thiazolidinedione use in patients.

The study provides valuable information on the pen from both patient and nurse perspectives in different simulated scenarios reflecting standard practice.

No abstract