In remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) short periods of non-lethal ischemia followed by reperfusion of tissue or organ prepare remote tissue or organ to resist a subsequent more severe ischemia-reperfusion injury. The signaling mechanism of RIPC can be humoral communication, neuronal stimulation, systemic modification of circulating immune cells, and activation of hypoxia inducible genes. Despite promising evidence from experimental studies, the clinical effects of RIPC have been controversial. Heterogeneity of inclusion and exclusion criteria and confounding factors such as comedication, anesthesia, comorbidities, and other risk factors may have influenced the efficacy of RIPC. Although the cardioprotective pathways of RIPC are more widely studied, there is also evidence of benefits in CNS, kidney and liver protection. Future research should explore the potential of RIPC, not only in cardiac protection, but also in patients with threatening ischemia of the brain, organ transplantation of the heart, liver and kidney and extensive cardiovascular surgery. RIPC is generally well-tolerated, safe, effective, and easily feasible. It has a great prospect for ischemic protection of the heart and other organs.

Remote ischemic preconditioning preserves spinal cord function after left subclavian artery and SA occlusion, as indicated by the MEP amplitudes.

ObjectiveTo study social and clinical characteristics of victims of sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to alcoholic cardiomyopathy (ACM).MethodsThe study population comprised a subset of Fingesture cohort. All subjects were verified SCD victims determined to have ACM as cause of death in medico-legal autopsy between 1998 and 2017 in Northern Finland. The Finnish Population Register Centre provided SCD victims’ last place of residence. Population data of residential area were obtained from Statistics Finland.ResultsFrom a total of 5869 SCD victims in Fingesture cohort, in 290 victims the cause of SCD was ACM (4.9%; median age 56 (50–62) years; 83% males). In 64 (22.1%) victims, the diagnosis of cardiac disease was made prior to death and in 226 (77.9%) at autopsy. There were no significant differences in autopsy findings between victims with or without known cardiac diagnosis, but steatohepatitis (94.5%) and liver cirrhosis (64,5%) were common in both groups. Alcoholism was more often recorded in the known cardiac disease group (64.1% vs 47.3%, p=0.023). Majority were included in the working age population (ie, under 65 years) (54.8% and 53.1%, p=0.810). In high-income communities, 28.8% of ACM SCD victims had previously diagnosed cardiac disease, the proportion in the middle-income and low-income communities was 18.6% (p=0.05).ConclusionsMajority of SCD victims due to ACM did not have previously diagnosed cardiac disease, but documented risk consumption of alcohol was common. This emphasises the importance of routine screening of alcohol consumption and signs of cardiomyopathy in heavy alcohol users in primary healthcare.

RIPC induces electrophysiologic changes in the central nervous system that may confer spinal cord protection extending the resistance to ischemia. The significantly higher nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 scores suggest better neuronal cell protection against oxidative stress in the RIPC group.