Background and objectives: St. John's wort (SJW) extracts are currently being used to treat depression of various degrees of severity. While many studies have shown it to be superior to placebo, data regarding the effectiveness of using SJW as a stand-alone treatment compared with standard antidepressants has yet to be proven conclusively. This study aims to understand the advantages and disadvantages of SJW as a treatment modality for depression.Methods: The authors searched PubMed, JAMA network, Springer Link, Elsevier, Google Scholar, and Scientific Progress databases, from 2011 through August 2021, using the following keywords: St John's wort, Hypericum perforatum, depression, antidepressant, complementary alternative medicine, economic evaluation depression St. wort, St John's wort and depression, antidepressant interactions. This yielded a total of 27 papers following a thorough removal of irrelevant content and dissemination in languages other than English.Results: In patients with mild and moderate depression, SJW proved superior to placebo. Certain studies comparing the efficacy of SJW versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), especially fluoxetine, reported SJW to be more efficacious, while the majority reported no significant difference. Tricyclic antidepressants were also found to have similar efficacy as SJW. Moreover, treatment with SJW was also found to reduce postmenopausal depression. Regarding the safety profile, although SJW is better tolerated with fewer adverse effects when compared to standardized antidepressants, its predisposition to causing fatal serotonin syndrome, when used in conjunction with other serotonergic agents and drug interactions noted with CYP 450 drugs, raises a question in the safety profile.Conclusion: It is essential to acknowledge that SJW has been used as a treatment measure in Germany. Despite being only listed as a dietary supplement by the FDA and not a drug, SJW has shown to be comparable, if not more efficacious, than most standard treatment options for depression. SJW does prove to be an exciting piece of pharmacotherapy in the realm of mental health and post-menopausal treatment. More prospective studies will help us better understand its efficacy in mild and moderate depression and its ability to serve as a long-term agent. Considering its mechanism of action, its role in relieving patients suffering from an anxiety disorder is also worth considering.

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH), also known as pseudotumor cerebri, is a syndrome characterized by an increase in intracranial pressure of unknown cause, leading to headaches, frequently in the morning, progressive vision loss, papilledema, pulsatile tinnitus, and in most cases, regular cerebrospinal fluid studies. The most robust and consistent risk factors occur in female patients of reproductive age and those with obesity. This condition in recent years has increased in reported cases due to an escalation in the rate of obesity and unhealthy lifestyles. Currently, there are varying therapeutic options for primary and secondary PTC patients. The first line of therapy includes weight loss and medications such as Acetazolamide, Topiramate. Although corticosteroids have previously been used, they are not recommended due to the risk of weight gain and therefore worsening the symptoms of intracranial hypertension in these patients.

Objectives To evaluate the demographic and comorbid risk factors for cerebrovascular disease (CVD) hospitalization in patients with retinal artery occlusion (RAO) and study the impact on hospitalization outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS, 2019). We included 62,255 adults (age 18-65 years) with the primary diagnosis of CVD. The study sample was divided by the co-diagnosis of RAO (N=1,700). A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the odds ratio (OR) of association for risk factors leading to CVD hospitalization in patients with RAO, with the non-RAO cohort as the reference category. Results The majority of the CVD patients with RAO were elderly (51-65 years, 68%), females (54%), and whites (47%). Yet, demographics did not significantly impact the association with CVD hospitalization between RAO and non-RAO patients. There was a significant difference in the geographic distribution of CVD hospitalizations with RAO, with the highest prevalence in the East North Central Atlantic (21%) and South Atlantic (18%) regions, and the lowest in the Mountain (4%) and East South Central (4%) regions. Comorbid diabetes with complications (69%), and complicated hypertension (55%) were most prevalent in patients with RAO thereby increasing the risk for CVD hospitalization by 7.8 (95% CI 6.9-8.8) and 1.8 times (95% CI 1.6-1.9), respectively. Patients with RAO and having major severity of illness were at increased risk of CVD hospitalization (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.9-3.9). Patients with RAO had a significant difference in adverse disposition, including transfer to the skilled nursing facility (SNF)/intermediate care facility (ICF) (32% vs. 24%) and requiring home health care (16% vs. 11%) compared to non-RAO patients. Conclusion The prevalence of RAO in CVD hospitalization was 2.7%, and demographics did not have any impact on the increasing risk of CVD. Comorbid diabetes (by 685%) and hypertension (by 78%) potentially increase the risk of CVD hospitalization in patients with RAO. These patients have a major severity of illness, leading to an adverse disposition. This calls for a collaborative care model to improve the quality of life in these at-risk patients with RAO.

We aim to delineate the differences in demographic characteristics and hospitalization outcomes including the severity of illness, hospitalization length of stay (LOS) and cost, utilization of deep brain stimulation (DBS), and disposition in Parkinson's disease (PD) inpatients with psychiatric comorbidities versus without psychiatric comorbidities. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), included 56,844 PD inpatients (age ≥40 years), and subdivided them by inpatients into those without psychiatric comorbidities (N = 38,629) and with psychiatric comorbidities (N = 18,471). We compared the distributions of demographic characteristics and hospitalization outcomes (severity of illness, utilization of DBS, and disposition) by performing Pearson's chi-square test, and we measured the differences in continuous variables (i.e., age, LOS, and cost) by using the independent samples t-test. ResultsA significantly higher proportion of PD inpatients with psychiatric comorbidities were female (44.4%) and white (83%) and had a moderate loss of functioning (48.8%) compared to those without psychiatric comorbidities. PD inpatients with psychiatric comorbidities had an increased mean LOS (4.7 days vs. 3.7 days, P <0.001) but a lower mean cost ($37,445 vs. $ 41,957, P <0.001). Also, there was a significantly lower utilization of DBS in PD inpatients with psychiatric comorbidities (19.2% vs. 26.9%, P <0.001) compared to those without psychiatric comorbidities, and an adverse disposition of transfer to a skilled nursing facility/intermediate care facility (47.1% vs. 39.6%, P <0.001) compared to PD inpatients without psychiatric comorbidities. ConclusionAlthough PD patients with psychiatric comorbidities had a moderate loss of functioning, there was significant underutilization of DBS. Meanwhile, psychiatric comorbidities among PD patients led to increased LOS and transfer to skilled facilities.