BACKGROUND: Targeted regional optimization (TRO), a partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta strategy, may mitigate distal ischemia and extend the window of effectiveness for this adjunct. An automated device may allow greater control and precise regulation of flow past the balloon, while being less resource-intensive. The objective of this study was to assess the technical feasibility of the novel advanced partial occlusion controller (APOC) in achieving TRO at multiple distal pressures. METHODS:Female swine (n = 48, 68.1 ± 0.7 kg) were randomized to a target distal mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 25 mm Hg, 35 mm Hg, or 45 mm Hg by either manual (MAN) or APOC regulation (n = 8 per group). Uncontrolled hemorrhage was generated by liver laceration. Targeted regional optimization was performed for 85 minutes, followed by surgical control and a 6-hour critical care phase. Proximal and distal MAP and flow rates were measured continuously. RESULTS:At a target distal MAP of 25 mm Hg, there was no difference in the MAP attained (APOC: 26.2 ± 1.05 vs. MAN: 26.1 ± 1.78 mm Hg) but the APOC had significantly less deviance (10.9%) than manual titration (14.9%, p < 0.0001). Similarly, at a target distal MAP of 45 mm Hg, there was no difference in mean pressure (44.0 ± 0.900 mm Hg vs. 45.2 ± 1.31 mm Hg) but APOC had less deviance (9.34% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.0001). There was no difference between APOC and MAN in mean (34.6 mm Hg vs. 33.7 mm Hg) or deviance (9.95% vs. 10.4%) at a target distal MAP of 35 mm Hg, respectively. The APOC made on average 77 balloon volume adjustments per experiment compared with 29 by manual titrations. CONCLUSION: The novel APOC consistently achieved and sustained precisely regulated TRO across all groups and demonstrated reduced deviance at the 25 mm Hg and 45 mm Hg groups compared with manual titration.

BACKGROUND Hemostatic dressings are used extensively in both military and civilian trauma to control lethal noncompressible hemorrhage. The ideal topical hemostatic agent would provide reliable hemostasis in patients with profound acidosis, coagulopathy, and shock. This study aimed to compare next-generation hemostatic agents against the current military standard in a translational swine model of vascular injury and coagulopathy. METHODS Female Yorkshire swine were randomized to eight groups (total n = 63; control n = 14, per group n = 7) of hemostatic agents and included: QuikClot Combat Gauze (Teleflex, Morrisville, NC), which served as the control; BloodSTOP IX (LifeScience Plus, Mountain View, CA); Celox Rapid (Medtrade Product, Crewe, United Kingdom); ChitoSAM 100 (Sam Medical, Tualatin, OR); EVARREST Fibrin Sealant Patch (Ethicon, Raritan, NJ); TAC Wrapping Gauze (H&H Medical, Williamsburg, VA); ChitoGauze XR Pro (Tricol Biomedical, Portland, OR); and X-Stat 30 (RevMedX, Wilsonville, OR). Hemodilution via exchange transfusion of 6% hetastarch was performed to induce acidosis and coagulopathy. An arteriotomy was created, allowing 30 seconds of free bleeding followed by application of the hemostatic agent and compression via an external compression device. A total of three applications were allowed for continued/recurrent bleeding. All blood loss was collected, and hemostatic agents were weighed to calculate blood volume loss. Following a 180-minute observation period, angiography was completed to evaluate for technical complication and distal perfusion of the limb. Finally, the limb was ranged five times to assess for rebleeding and clot stability. RESULTS All swine were confirmed coagulopathic with rotational thromboelastography and acidotic (pH 7.2 ± 0.02). BloodSTOP IX allowed a significant increase in blood loss and number of applications required to obtain hemostasis compared with all other groups. BloodSTOP IX demonstrated a decreased survival rate (29%, p = 0.02). All mortalities were directly attributed to exsanguination as a result of device failure. In surviving animals, there was no difference in extravasation. BloodSTOP IX had an increased rebleeding rate after ranging compared with QuikClot Combat Gauze (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Most novel hemostatic agents demonstrated comparable efficacy compared with the currently military standard hemostatic dressing, CG.