In this study the effectiveness of The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) at assessing patients with mixed brain impairment was compared with that of a number of other commonly used neuropsychological measures. Subjects were 50 patients with a mixture of medically confirmed neuropathologies, and 50 controls with no evidence of neurological history. Groups were equated for age, education, and sex. The AVLT was administered as pan of a full neuropsychological battery. Results indicated that all seven AVLT recall trials and the total of Trials I-V could significantly differentiate between the two groups (p <.001). The AVLT trial V score performed best (U = 457.5, p <.0001), correctly predicting group membership for 74% of the subjects. This hit-rate was better than any other single test on the Halstead-Reitan or Dodrill batteries, and was surpassed only by the Dodrill Discrimination Index. The potential usefulness of this test as part of a neuropsychological battery is discussed.
In this study the effectiveness of The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) at assessing patients with mixed brain impairment was compared with that of a number of other commonly used neuropsychological measures. Subjects were 50 patients with a mixture of medically confirmed neuropathologies, and 50 controls with no evidence of neurological history. Groups were equated for age, education, and sex. The AVLT was administered as pan of a full neuropsychological battery. Results indicated that all seven AVLT recall trials and the total of Trials I-V could significantly differentiate between the two groups (p <.001). The AVLT trial V score performed best (U = 457.5, p <.0001), correctly predicting group membership for 74% of the subjects. This hit-rate was better than any other single test on the Halstead-Reitan or Dodrill batteries, and was surpassed only by the Dodrill Discrimination Index. The potential usefulness of this test as part of a neuropsychological battery is discussed.
Case Number 42 ~~-Y E A R -O L D WHITE, widowed, gravidaA VII, para V, aborta 2 was admitted to the gynecology service with a history of postmenopausal bleeding; her last menstrual period had been in 1947. Following menopause, she had no history of vaginal bleeding until 3 weeks before hospitalization. Other complaints included right lower quadrant pain, without associated gastrointestinal symptoms, and easy fatigability. Past history included a fracture of the left femur 2 years before admission, treated by traction and casting. No history of food or drug allergies was obtained. The patient had never received a blood transfusion or a general anesthetic agent.The preanesthetic survey revealed that the patient was afebrile, weight 133 pounds, height 64 inches, systemic blood pressure in recumbent position 130 mm. of mercury systolic, 80 mm. diastolic, and apical pulse rate 60 per minute.The head and neck were normal, with the exception of poor oral hygiene with gross dental caries and several loose teeth. No masses or areas of tenderness were found in either breast. The chest was clear to percussion and auscultation. The heart was not enlarged. The rhythm was normal sinus; a grade I1 out of V I apical systolic murmur was present.On pelvic examination (by the gynecologists), the outlet was parous with fair support. The vault was atrophic with obliterat-ed fornices, and a 2-cm. inclusion cyst was present on the anterior wall. The cervix was small and had an area of central erosion. The corpus was of normal size, retroverted, and mobile. There was an adnexal mass on the right side. Examination of the extremities revealed bilateral varices.Laboratory data were as follows: hemogram 13.7 gm., venous hematocrit 42 per cent, and total leukocyte count 8750 with a normal differential. Urinalysis was within normal limits. The fasting blood sugar value was 73 mg. per 100 ml. The blood urea nitrogen level was 20 mg. per 100 ml. The electrocardiogram was interpreted as normal.During the preanesthetic visit, the possibility of dislodgment of a tooth (or teeth) was discussed with the patient by the anesthesiologist and was noted in the chart. The operative procedures contemplated were pelvic examination under anesthesia, dilatation and curettage, and possibly celiotomy. The patient was considered to be a good risk for anesthesia and surgery. Premedication consisted of 100 mg. of pentobarbital sodium and 0.4 mg. of atropine sulfate administered intramuscularly 55 minutes before induction. The anesthetic agent was PentothaP sodium, 100 mg. intravenously, followed by cyclopropane and oxygen in a closed system.Following dilatation and curettage, the gynecologists informed the anesthesiologist that an abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingeoophorectomy were indicated.
Objective This study aimed to determine the relationship between symptom self-report accuracy and objective cognitive functioning in multiple cognitive domains for varying neurocognitive impairment (NCI) subsequent to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Specifically, the discrepancy between self-report and objective findings among participants with mild, moderate, and severe NCI was examined within the cognitive domains of Attention, Executive Functioning, Learning/Memory, and Speech/Language. Method The sample included archival data consisting of neuropsychological scores and self-reported Ruff Neurobehavioral Inventory (RNBI) results of 135 adult TBI patients with mild, moderate, or severe NCI who received neuropsychological assessment at a private practice. Patients were grouped based on level of impairment using Halstead Impairment Index criteria. Results No main effect was found for Attention. Patients with severe NCI had greater discrepancies in Executive Functioning (p = 0.015), Learning/Memory (p = 0.015), and Speech/Language (p < 0.001) function, when compared to those with mild NCI. Additionally, patients with severe NCI demonstrated greater discrepancies in Speech/Language (p < 0.001) function when compared to those with moderate NCI. Conclusion These findings indicate as severity of neurocognitive impairment increases for TBI patients, self-reported cognitive symptomatology—specifically executive functioning, learning/memory, and speech/language—will become less accurate. Clinically, these findings suggest that when working with patients who have severe neurocognitive deficits subsequent to TBI, it is important to consider objective testing as self-reporting may not be accurate. Understanding patient’s genuine deficits will foster patient awareness and acceptance of TBI-related cognitive deficits with increased investment in treatment and improved neurorehabilitation outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.