The Office of Naval Research (ONR) Live-Virtual-Constructive (LVC) training program seeks to safely integrate virtual tracks (display symbols that represent aircraft flown by pilots in simulators) and constructive tracks (symbols that represent computer-generated aircraft) into live F/A-18 E/F/G radar and cockpit sensor system displays to reduce resource demands and support new capability requirements in air combat training. In a preceding effort, the researchers identified a number of aircrew concerns about the design of LVC training technology and its potential effects on air combat training quality and realism. Based on these findings, the researchers conducted an exploratory survey to better establish and gauge LVC fidelity requirements. Thirty air combat training professionals completed the survey. The survey results, presented herein, will be used to guide LVC engineering decision-making and design trade-offs.

Introducing the Live-Virtual-Constructive (LVC) training paradigm into live air combat training means introducing significant changes into a complex and established training system. To facilitate the transition, research was performed to identify possible new hazards that might emerge as a result of the changes and to assess the ability of the live training system to withstand them. Aircrew interviews were conducted and submitted to qualitative analysis, the results of which were further assessed by air combat experts, to identify both potential hazards and mechanisms the training system uses to withstand, or be resilient to, hazards. This paper focuses on those system resilience mechanisms and their adequacy for protecting system effectiveness and aircrew safety in the face of changes associated with the adoption of LVC training.

The Navy is investigating the use of Live-Virtual-Constructive (LVC) simulation to train F/A-18 pilots. LVC, which introduces computer-generated tracks into live training, will be embedded into Navy air combat training, an extremely complex and nuanced system. This paper describes research conducted to facilitate the integration of this new technology into the existing training system. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 air combat professionals to understand their training system and the ways LVC technology could affect its safety and effectiveness. Results reported here focus on ways LVC technology could be employed to benefit air combat training. Associated research required to determine the best LVC design requirements for enabling those employment strategies within Navy training were also identified. A case is made for the utility of this type of future-system exploration research; such research is invaluable to systems acquisition, which frequently involves making changes to existing complex systems.At present, the Navy faces a number of environmental and economic challenges to the creation and maintenance of combat readiness. These challenges include: the high cost of flight hours, a limited number of pilots available to fly as adversaries, environmental restrictions on the use of training ranges, and ranges of inadequate size for practicing with and against advanced technology.In an effort to mitigate these economic and environmental threats to air wing readiness, the Navy is investigating the use of a Live-Virtual-Constructive (LVC) training paradigm in F/A-18 air combat training. The LVC training paradigm combines live flight with simulated elements. Utilizing recent advances in high-speed datalink technology, virtual tracks (pilots "flying" simulators on the ground) and constructive tracks (computer-generated forces) are shown on the cockpit sensor system displays of live aircraft.LVC technology will be implemented in Navy air combat training, an extremely complex and nuanced system that has existed and evolved over decades. The Navy air combat training system consists of aircraft of many types playing complementary, coordinated roles in complex, choreographed events that, due to infinitely variable circumstances, rarely play out quite as planned. The system includes the training procedures, rules, and practices devised to keep the aircraft coordinated and separated regardless of the difficulty of the circumstances. It additionally includes training syllabi, manuals, objectives, exercises, and events; instructors and range safety or training officers; and a unique culture. Changes have been introduced into air combat training before, but the change represented by the LVC paradigm is particularly invasive, involving the piping of fictional information into pilots' cockpits even as they struggle to cope with the constant flow of rapidly changing information about their actual surroundings.Introducing change into a complex system is the basis of many an adage, including the law of unintended...

Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

Frequently, the human element is overlooked and regarded as an afterthought. For instance, training programs may teach workarounds for design issues rather than fixing them before building a system. However, diagnosing and identifying issues beforehand by looking at the whole system is difficult. In the Vision for Naval Aviation 2025, Live, Virtual and Constructive (LVC) training is stated as fundamental to fleet readiness when faced with increasing threat capabilities and increasing cost to operate live aircraft. Further, the Chief Naval Office’s navigation plan cites LVC training as the goal for the PB-16 program to ensure sailors are “prepared, confident and proficient.” Thus, the issue of current training technologies not addressing the increasing threat has been identified. To address this, and include the human element, the Office of Naval Research (ONR) initiated the LVC Training Fidelity (LVC TF) program, specifically focused on the safety, fidelity and technological needs for LVC.