BackgroundWhile research has demonstrated the importance of a clean health care environment, there is a lack of research on the role portable medical equipment (PME) play in the transmission cycle of healthcare-acquired infections (HAIs). This study investigated the patterns and sequence of contact events among health care workers, patients, surfaces, and medical equipment in a hospital environment.MethodsResearch staff observed patient care events over six different 24 h periods on six different hospital units. Each encounter was recorded as a sequence of events and analyzed using sequence analysis and visually represented by network plots. In addition, a point prevalence microbial sample was taken from the computer on wheels (COW).ResultsThe most touched items during patient care was the individual patient (850), bedrail (375), bed-surface (302), and bed side Table (223). Three of the top ten most common subsequences included touching PME and the patient: computer on wheels ➔ patient (62 of 274 total sequences, 22.6%, contained this sequence), patient ➔ COW (20.4%), and patient ➔ IV pump (16.1%). The network plots revealed large interconnectedness among objects in the room, the patient, PME, and the healthcare worker.ConclusionsOur results demonstrated that PME such as COW and IV pump were two of the most highly-touched items during patient care. Even with proper hand sanitization and personal protective equipment, this sequence analysis reveals the potential for contamination from the patient and environment, to a vector such as portable medical equipment, and ultimately to another patient in the hospital.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-017-2895-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has rapidly spread across the world and was subsequently declared as a pandemic in 2020. To overcome this public health challenge, comprehensive understanding of the disease transmission is urgently needed. Recent evidences suggest that the most common route of transmission for SARS-CoV-2 is likely via droplet, aerosol, or direct contact in a person-to-person encounter, although the possibility of transmission via fomites from surfaces cannot be ruled out entirely. Environmental contamination in COVID-19 patient rooms is widely observed due to viral shedding from both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, and SARS-CoV-2 can survive on hospital surfaces for extended periods. Sequence of contact events can spread the virus from one surface to the other in a hospital setting. Here, we review the studies related to viral shedding by COVID-19 patients that can contaminate surfaces and survival of SARS-CoV-2 on different types of surfaces commonly found in healthcare settings, as well as evaluating the importance of surface to person transmission characteristics. Based on recent evidences from the literature, decontamination of hospital surfaces should constitute an important part of the infection control and prevention of COVID-19.

No abstract

No abstract

Background The reduction in microbial bioburden achieved by terminal disinfection in a hospital may vary considerably by type of disinfectant or cleaner and by environmental service (EVS) personnel. This study estimated whether supplemental ultraviolet (UV) irradiation after disinfection or cleaning reduced bioburden and whether the supplemental effect persisted after adjusting for disinfectant or cleaner type and EVS personnel. Methods Environmental samples for aerobic bacterial colonies (ABC) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were obtained from 5 high-touch surfaces in patient rooms at 3 time points: before manual cleaning, after manual cleaning using 1 of 3 disinfectants or 1 cleaner, and after UV irradiation. Results For ABC, the model-estimated mean (95% uncertainty interval) counts were 56% (48%–63%) lower for postmanual + UV compared with manual clean alone, and for MRSA they were 93% (62%–99%) lower for postmanual + UV vs manual clean alone. Conclusions Although UV supplementation provides incremental benefit in bioburden reduction across all cleaners or disinfectants tested, it provides the greatest benefit when supplementing cleaners or disinfectants with the lowest disinfection properties. UV irradiation provides additional bioburden reduction to manual cleaning or disinfection, even when accounting for variability introduced by different disinfectants and EVS personnel.