The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of bacteremia after a single professional subgingival irrigation with a 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse (CHX) as well as after a subsequent scaling and root planing (S/RP) during the same visit. Thirty subjects each with at least 1 site that probed 4 mm or more and bled on probing were randomly assigned to the following groups: 1) irrigation with 0.12% CHX; 2) irrigation with sterile water; and 3) non-irrigated controls. To begin the study blood was drawn just before and 2 minutes after irrigation. Thirty minutes later, blood was drawn again just before and 2 minutes after S/RP at the same site. Specimens were cultured for anaerobic and aerobic microorganisms using standard cultural techniques. Eighteen blood cultures from 15 subjects yielded positive cultures resulting in 23 isolates. Gram-positive rods comprised 34.8% of the total isolates; Gram-positive cocci 34.8%, Gram-negative rods 21.7%, and Gram-negative cocci 8.7%. In the CHX group, bacteremia was detected in 5 subjects after irrigation and in 2 other subjects after S/RP. In the water group, bacteremia was detected in one subject after irrigation and in 4 subjects after S/RP. The control group had 3 bacteremias after S/RP. There was no significant difference between the incidence of bacteremia associated with irrigation by CHX or sterile water (P = 0.141). There was also no significant difference in the incidence of bacteremia after S/RP between the CHX and sterile water irrigation groups and in patients who did not receive irrigation (control group) (P = 0.88).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of professional subgingival irrigation, together with subsequent patient administered home marginal irrigation, on the incidence of bacteremia after scaling and root planing (Sc/RP). A total of 60 periodontal maintenance patients were assigned to either Group 1: subgingival irrigation, with 0.12% CHX and daily marginal irrigation with 0.04% CHX; Group 2: subgingival irrigation with 0.12% CHX and daily marginal irrigation with water; Group 3: subgingival and daily marginal irrigation with water; Group 4: Non‐irrigation (control). Patients entered the study after receiving a thorough periodontal maintenance appointment including a complete examination, Sc/RP, and standard oral hygiene instruction. Blood samples were taken at the 3‐month visit before and after Sc/RP. Microbiological culturing was done using the Septi‐Chek system, selective and non‐selective media. Results from 54 patients showed that bacteremia was detected prior to Sc/RP in 2 patients and after Sc/RP in 10 patients. No significant effect by treatment regimens on post Sc/RP bacteremia could be detected. The organisms isolated included Eubacterium lentum, Propionibacterium acnes, Streptococcus species, Neisseria species, Candida albicans, Staphylococcus species, and un‐identified Gram‐negative rods. J Periodontol 1990; 61:405– 411.

Previous investigations have shown that, in biopsies taken from untreated sites of periodontitis, bacteria were present between the epithelial cells and within the connective tissue. In the present study we have examined Gram-stained sections of diseased gingival sites where the disease had recurred after surgical periodontal treatment. The six subjects chosen for the study were patients who had undergone surgical therapy for the treatment of periodontitis and who, upon subsequent recall visits, showed evidence of at least one site recurrent after treatment as detected by bleeding on probing and increased pocket depth of 5 mm or more. A normal control site from the same patient was chosen, preferably contralaterally, showing positive response to treatment with no signs of disease. Sections were stained with either hematoxylin and eosin for tissue survey or Gram for assessment of bacteria and examined by light microscopy. In many specimens, the bacterial nature of Gram-stained material was substantiated. Preliminary results showed a significantly increased number of bacteria in the refractory sites when compared with control sites which responded positively to treatment. The results of this investigation provided further evidence that bacterial presence inside the periodontal tissue may be an important pathogenic factor in periodontal disease.