Accurate estimates of ground penetrating radar (GPR) traveltimes and velocities are essential to a number of civil engineering, agricultural and watershed management activities. This paper reports on a study to assess confidence limits on radar parameters using a sequence of high quality common midpoint (CMP) soundings collected on eight different days over the course of a year at a single location for a range of soil moisture conditions. On each day, a "repeat" CMP was acquired leading to a total of 16 independent CMP soundings.Two prominent reflections, present in all 16 independent CMP soundings, were analyzed to provide NMO velocities and vertical two-way traveltimes along with their associated 95% confidence limits estimated using Student's t-test, accounting for both the appropriate number of observations and estimated parameters. Interval properties were then determined using the Dix relation. The radar velocity of the 1 st interval has the largest variation observed, from 0.074 (±0.002) m/ns to 0.146 (±0.003) m/ns for wet and dry soil moisture conditions, respectively. However, over this same time period, the estimated thickness of each interval, 0.9 (±0.1) m and 2.9 (±0.2) m, remains constant within the respective 95% confidence limits on the 16 independent estimates and their composite average. The latter result provides a useful check on the quality of our interpretation. Analysis of the ground refraction phases also confirmed the interval velocity and thickness inferred from the reflection data.The global results of this study suggest that NMO radar velocities and vertical two-way traveltimes may be optimally resolved at the 95% confidence level with precisions of ±0.001 m/ns and ±0.7 ns, respectively. The deviation between measurements from repeat CMPs on a given day typically fall well within the 95% confidence limit. Thus, while repeat CMP data provide a valuable check on quality control, we note that a posteriori estimates of confidence limits might provide an acceptable alternative for many applications. Regardless of the field procedure selected, this study emphasizes that an assessment of data quality is only possible by a clear statement of confidence limits and by carefully defining the basis for their estimation.
A magnetotelluric survey consisting of 18 separate soundings was performed in 1982 along a 125‐km profile crossing the eastern neovolcanic zone in south Iceland. Although the three‐dimensional ocean effect may be significant at the longest periods which previous workers have analyzed to study features in the upper mantle beneath Iceland, our studies suggest that this effect is minimal for periods less than 1000 s at distances greater than 50 km from the coast. Therefore we are confident that two‐dimensional interpretations are valid at periods suitable for interpreting crustal resistivities. Such a two‐dimensional interpretation presented here indicates the presence of a layer (∼5 km thick) of low resistivity (5 ohm m) at the crust‐mantle interface (10–20 km depth). The depth to this layer increases from the center of the neovolcanic zone. This feature has been seen elsewhere in Iceland by other workers. However, the present study suggests that east of the neovolcanic zone the low‐resistivity layer is not present, which we argue may be associated with a recent eastward shift of the axial rift zone to a new location within older crust. A striking feature of our two‐dimensional crustal interpretation is that pockets of low‐resistivity material appear to be present at approximately 8 km depth at the base of the crust beneath the two volcanic centers that we have studied, Torfajokull and Hekla. These may be manifestations of local magma chambers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.