The effects of subcutaneous administration of 10, 30, or 100 microg q.i.d. pramlintide, an analog of human amylin, on plasma glucose regulation in patients with IDDM were evaluated in a multicenter trial. The plasma glucose response to a Sustacal test meal was significantly reduced compared with placebo both after 1 week and after 2 weeks of administration of 30 or 100 microg pramlintide. In addition, 24-h mean plasma glucose concentrations were significantly lowered in patients receiving 30 microg of pramlintide for 2 weeks compared with placebo, while the 100-microg pramlintide dose did not reach statistical significance for the 24-h glucose profiles. At 10 microg, pramlintide had no effect on the 24-h glucose profile or on the plasma glucose response to a Sustacal test meal. The reduction in 24-h glucose concentrations and glucose concentrations after the Sustacal test meal observed at the 30-microg pramlintide dose was not accompanied by an increased incidence of hypoglycemic events. The most frequent adverse events were dose-related and involved transient upper gastrointestinal symptoms. A majority (>80%) of the patients who reported these adverse events during week 1 did not report them in week 2. These data indicate that pramlintide effectively reduces plasma glucose concentrations as reflected in both a 24-h glucose profile and a Sustacal test meal while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.

One hundred sixty-nine normal men received varying propranolol dosage regimens and placebo. Dose level and frequency were compared with plasma propranolol levels and beta blockade, as assessed by reduction of exercise tachycardia. Propranolol levels above 20 ng/ml induced significant beta blockade. An average daily propranolol dose slightly in excess of 160 mg led to a minimum plasma level above 20 ng/ml. Approximately 50% of subjects achieved 20 bpm or greater decrease in exercise tachycardia with 160 mg per day. The degree of beta blockade at the daily minimum propranolol level was related to dose and not dose frequency. The relation of propranolol dose and plasma levels to beta blockade in normal subjects appears to reflect observations in large clinical trials.

Etodolac was compared with aspirin and placebo for efficacy and safety, and a minimum effective dose was established in 264 patients with adult-onset, active rheumatoid arthritis. In this six-week, 14-center, double-blind, parallel-group investigation, preceded by a washout period of up to two weeks, patients received daily doses of etodolac at 50, 100, or 200 mg/d; aspirin at 3,900 mg/d; or placebo. Both etodolac at the highest dose and aspirin produced statistically significant improvement from baseline in all disease activity assessments measured at four- and six-week end points and were superior to placebo in the majority of assessments. A greater number of patient complaints occurred with aspirin, especially in regard to gastrointestinal-related and otologic side effects. A significant therapeutic dose response was evident among the etodolac groups without an increase in side effects. Although the 100-mg/d dose was effective in many of the efficacy parameters measured, the 200-mg/d dose, which is comparably efficacious to aspirin 3.9 g/d, was suggested as the minimum effective dose for the relief of the signs and symptoms of active rheumatoid arthritis.

Etodolac, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory and analgesic drug, was used in a randomized, parallel group, open-label design study, with stool analysis conducted in a blind fashion, to compare its effect in normal men in doses of 400 mg (N = 11) and 600 mg (N = 12) b.i.d. on gastrointestinal microbleeding with that of 600 mg ibuprofen, q.i.d. (N = 12), 50 mg indomethacin in the morning, 50 mg at noon, and 100 mg h.s. (N = 9), and 375 mg naproxen b.i.d. (N = 9). Etodolac was given at about 2 1/2 and 3 1/2 times the mean effective dose used for treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The other drugs were given at their manufacturers' maximum recommended doses. Lead-in placebo was given for one week, active drug for one week, and washout placebo for one week. Fecal blood loss was measured by the 51Cr-tagged red cell method, and was averaged over days 4-7 (baseline), 11-14 (treatment period), and 17-20 (washout). The mean increase in blood loss for the treatment period for the 400 mg etodolac b.i.d. group (0.13 ml) and 600 mg etodolac b.i.d. group (0.10 ml) was significantly less (P = 0.001) than the corresponding values for ibuprofen (1.14 ml), indomethacin (1.20 ml), and naproxen (0.87 ml). There was no tendency for greater blood loss at higher doses of etodolac. Etodolac at doses in excess of the mean effective dose in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis caused significantly less microbleeding in normal male volunteers during the seven-day treatment period than the other drugs tested, and not clinically more than that occurring during baseline placebo.

The effects of etodolac, a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, on gastrointestinal (GI) microbleeding were quantitatively assessed in two studies in healthy adult men. The first was a two-group, open-label, parallel comparison of etodolac, 600 mg/day, aspirin, 2600 mg/day, and placebo in 20 subjects; the second was a four-group, double-blind, parallel comparison of etodolac, 600, 800, and 1200 mg/day, aspirin, 2600 mg/day, and placebo in 41 subjects. Subjects in both studies received a single-blind placebo on days 1 through 7, either etodolac or aspirin on days 8 through 14, and a single-blind placebo on days 15 through 19. GI blood loss (milliliters per day) was estimated by the radiolabeled (51Cr) erythrocyte method and was based on daily radioactivity counts of stool specimens and regression-estimated daily blood radioactivity. Etodolac, 600 mg/day, induced no significant GI blood loss at any time during the experiments, nor was there significant blood loss after 800 and 1200 mg/day in experiment 2. Blood loss was noted after aspirin in both.