No abstract

The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the rates of treatment failure, which was a composite of clinical and microbiologic failure, of patients receiving vancomycin and a β-lactam to those receiving vancomycin only for methicillin-resistant (MRSA) bacteremia. Patients 16 to 89 years of age with MRSA bacteremia admitted to a university-affiliated hospital from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016 were screened for study inclusion. Patients were eligible if they received>48 h of vancomycin and a β-lactam (combination group) or vancomycin only (standard group) within 48 h after bacteremia onset. A total of 182 patients were screened: 47 were included in the standard group, and 63 were in the combination group. The combination group had a higher baseline body mass index (29.2 ± 8.0 kg/m versus 25.8 ± 7.1 kg/m, = 0.022), acute physiologic assessment and chronic health evaluation-II (APACHE-II) score (median [interquartile range], 21 [15 to 26] versus 16 [10 to 22], = 0.003), and incidence of septic shock (31.8% versus 14.9%, = 0.047). Using multivariate analysis, combination therapy was the only variable that decreased treatment failures (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.337 [0.142 to 0.997]), while vancomycin MIC> 1 mg/liter and male gender increased treatment failures (4.018 [1.297 to 12.444] and 2.971 [1.040 to 8.488], respectively). The 30-day mortality rates (15.0% versus 14.9%, = 1.000) and the incidence of adverse drug events (19.1% versus 23.4%, = 0.816) were not statistically different between the combination and standard groups. Combination therapy of vancomycin with a β-lactam led to significantly fewer treatment failures than vancomycin monotherapy for MRSA bacteremia.

No abstract

Dosing vancomycin in critically ill patients often results in subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic trough concentrations. In this retrospective study, we compared the time to goal trough attainment and incidence of acute kidney injury in intensive care unit (ICU) patients whose vancomycin was dosed by a pharmacy pharmacokinetic (PK) dosing and monitoring service to the standard of care. Three-hundred fifty adult ICU patients at a Level 1 trauma, teaching hospital who received vancomycin for >24 hours from February 1, 2016, to November 30, 2016, were screened. Patients were included in the PK group if consecutive serum concentrations were used to calculate individualized PK and determine a dosing regimen. Patients who were dosed using troughs only were then matched 1-to-1 to the PK group by date of vancomycin initiation and included in the traditional group. Fifty patients were included in each group. Baseline characteristics were similar, except the PK group had more patients under the care of the neuromedical ICU service (42% vs 18%; P = .02) and fewer patients with a corrected creatinine clearance <30 mL/min/1.73 m (22% vs 46%; P = .02). Attainment of goal trough concentrations for the PK and traditional groups were 84.4% and 29.4% by 48 hours (P = .0001), 88.4% and 60.7% by 72 hours (P = .009), and 92.9% and 77.8% by 96 hours (P = .1), respectively. Incidence of acute kidney injury between the PK and traditional groups was not statistically significant (8.3% vs 14%; P = .5). Utilization of individualized pharmacokinetic dosing of vancomycin in critically ill patients resulted in faster goal trough attainment without an increase in nephrotoxicity.

No abstract