The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic spread globally in the beginning of 2020. At present, predictors of severe disease and the efficacy of different treatments are not well understood. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies up to 15 March 2020, which reported COVID-19 clinical features and/or treatment outcomes. Forty-five studies reporting 4203 patients were included. Pooled rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were 10.9%, 4.3%, and 18.4%, respectively. On meta-regression, ICU admission was predicted by increased leukocyte count (P < .0001), alanine aminotransferase (P = .024), and aspartate transaminase (P = .0040); elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P < .0001); and increased procalcitonin (P < .0001). ARDS was predicted by elevated LDH (P < .0001), while mortality was predicted by increased leukocyte count (P = .0005) and elevated LDH (P < .0001). Treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir showed no significant benefit in mortality and ARDS rates. Corticosteroids were associated with a higher rate of ARDS (P = .0003).

Background and purpose Although COVID‐19 predominantly affects the respiratory system, recent studies have reported the occurrence of neurological disorders such as stroke in relation to COVID‐19 infection. Encephalitis is an inflammatory condition of the brain that has been described as a severe neurological complication of COVID‐19. Despite a growing number of reported cases, encephalitis related to COVID‐19 infection has not been adequately characterised. To address this gap, this systematic review and meta‐analysis aims to describe the incidence, clinical course, and outcomes of patients who suffer from encephalitis as a complication of COVID‐19. Methods All studies published between 1 November 2019 and 24 October 2020 that reported on patients who developed encephalitis as a complication of COVID‐19 were included. Only cases with radiological and/or biochemical evidence of encephalitis were included. Results In this study, 610 studies were screened and 23 studies reporting findings from 129,008 patients, including 138 with encephalitis, were included. The average time from diagnosis of COVID‐19 to onset of encephalitis was 14.5 days (range = 10.8–18.2 days). The average incidence of encephalitis as a complication of COVID‐19 was 0.215% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.056%–0.441%). The average mortality rate of encephalitis in COVID‐19 patients was 13.4% (95% CI = 3.8%–25.9%). These patients also had deranged clinical parameters, including raised serum inflammatory markers and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis. Conclusions Although encephalitis is an uncommon complication of COVID‐19, when present, it results in significant morbidity and mortality. Severely ill COVID‐19 patients are at higher risk of suffering from encephalitis as a complication of the infection.

No abstract

Background: Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is frequently utilized as a salvage therapy for patients with cardiopulmonary failure, outcomes of its use in peripartum patients have not been clearly established. We aimed to review peer-reviewed publications on the use of ECMO in pregnant and postpartum patients, with analyses of maternal and fetal outcomes. Methods: Data were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases from 1972 up to November 2017 for publications on ECMO in peripartum patients. Search terms included “ECMO,” “ECLS,”, “pregnancy,” “postpartum,” and “peripartum.” Publications with 3 or more patients were reviewed for quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for prevalence studies and case series. Results: After reviewing 143 publications, 9 observational studies met our inclusion criteria. Pooled prevalence of maternal survival was 77.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.1%-88.4%). Pooled prevalence of fetal survival was 69.1% (95% CI: 44.7%-89.8%). The level of heterogeneity across studies was low for both outcomes. Meta-regression did not reveal any correlation between pregnant women with pulmonary or cardiac indications and maternal survival. Individual patient data meta-regression demonstrated higher odds of survival for patients on venovenous ECMO compared to those on venoarterial ECMO that was close to statistical significance (odds ratio = 3.016, 95% CI: 0.901-11.144; P = .081) after adjusting for pregnancy status. Conclusions: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be considered as an acceptable salvage therapy for pregnant and postpartum patients with critical cardiac or pulmonary illness.

No abstract