Our results support the hypothesis that MRSA produces more severe bone infection and is likely to require more aggressive surgical and medical management.
BackgroundPediatric Candida infections are associated with worse clinical outcomes and increased costs. Yet, it is not definitively known if particular species are associated with more severe illness. Differential risk factor exposures among the species group may also exist. We aimed to determine whether certain Candida species are more strongly associated with worse outcomes, and whether certain risk factors more strongly predispose patients to infection with certain species.MethodsMicrobiology lab records from patients seen from 2003 to 2010 at an urban children’s hospital were reviewed for invasive or disseminated Candida infections. Data on measures of disease severity/outcome and risk factors were abstracted and analyzed to determine differences associated with various Candida species.ResultsExactly 106 cases of infection were analyzed. Non-albicans species were associated with a significantly longer length of stay postdiagnosis (P=0.03), as well as longer treatment (P=0.02). Candida albicans was associated with a higher number of antihypotensive medications required (P=0.03) and length of mechanical ventilation postdiagnosis (P=0.05). Candida tropicalis was associated with the highest mortality (45.5%). Hypotension, which was found to be significantly associated with concurrent infection, was significantly associated with increased risk of mortality (odds ratio =5.85, P=0.005). Initial choice of antifungal therapy was not associated with differences in eventual patient mortality. Multivariate logistic regression modeling revealed a trend toward C. albicans infection in patients receiving antineoplastic chemotherapy and non-albicans infection in patients with >96 hours mechanical ventilation.ConclusionInterspecies differences may exist for Candida in terms of disease severity and risk factors. Underlying morbidity and the role of concurrent infections may play a key role in poor outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.