The classification system for degenerative disc disease proposed by Kellgren et al and the method of measurement of sagittal curves from C2 to C7 demonstrated an acceptable level of reliability and can be used in outcomes research.

The presence of an implanted pacemaker is widely regarded as an absolute contraindication to magnetic resonance (MR) imaging; however, this viewpoint is based largely on safety concerns in the 1982-1996 period. Since 1996, changes in pacemaker electronics including decreased ferromagnetic content, increased sophistication of the circuitry, and onboard computer capabilities suggest that the absolute contraindication of MR imaging for pacemaker patients should be reconsidered. In addition, there are now data from prospective trials of 232 patients with demand pacemakers who underwent MR imaging at 0.5-1.5 T. Although a variety of pacemaker parameters were evaluated before, during, immediately after, and 3 months after MR imaging, no significant pacemaker changes were identified. No patients reported abnormal sensations such as pacemaker movement or irregular heartbeats even at direct questioning. These results suggest that peripheral locations such as the brain and knee may be considered for MR imaging. Thus, pacemaker patients should be assessed individually for their suitability for MR imaging, which may be performed safely under defined conditions.

No abstract

Measurement of ADC intensity and texture has the potential to differentially diagnose malignancy in individual ovarian masses if the problem of image motion artifact can be eliminated through the use of faster imaging sequences.

During a routine physical examination of an adult female with a history of breast cancer and cervical lymphadenopathy, a mass was noted in the right supraclavicular region. The mass was unilateral and easily palpable along the superior border near the median aspect of the clavicle. Plain film radiography, performed to determine whether the mass represented an enlarged jugulo-omohyoid lymph node, revealed an elongated opaque mass in this region. Computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images were subsequently obtained. Sequential axial CT scans revealed a cylindrical mass that appeared to be independent of contiguous muscles, including the sternocleidomastoid, anterior, and middle scalene muscles. This mass attached inferiorly to the clavicle and superiorly to the transverse process of the sixth cervical vertebra. Sagittal, coronal, and axial MR scans confirmed the presence of a well-defined superficial mass. It is concluded that the mass represents a levator claviculae (cleidocervical) muscle. This observation underscores the importance of understanding soft tissue variants that may be encountered during a routine physical examination.