Interest in high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) for both induction and postremission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) prompted the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) to initiate a randomized trial comparing HDAC with standard-dose cytarabine (SDAC) for remission induction of previously untreated AML and to compare high-dose treatment versus conventional doses for consolidation therapy. Patients less than 65 years of age with de novo or secondary AML were randomized for induction between SDAC 200 mg/ m2/d for 7 days by continuous infusion or HDAC at 2 g/ m2 intravenously every 12 hours for 12 doses; both groups received daunorubicin (DNR) at 45 mg/m2/d intravenously for 3 days. Complete responders to SDAC were randomized to receive either two additional courses of SDAC plus DNR or one course of HDAC plus DNR. Complete responders to HDAC were nonrandomly assigned to receive one additional course of HDAC plus DNR. Of patients randomized between SDAC (n = 493) and HDAC (n = 172) induction, 361 achieved complete remission (CR). The CR rate was slightly poorer with HDAC: 55% versus 58% with SDAC for patients aged less than 50, and 45% (HDAC) versus 53% (SDAC) for patients aged 50 to 64 (age-adjusted one-tailed P = .96). With a median follow-up time of 51 months, survival was not significantly better with HDAC (P = .41); the estimated survival rate at 4 years was 32% (HDAC) versus 22% (SDAC) for those aged less than 50, and 13% (HDAC) versus 11% (SDAC) for those aged 50 to 64. However, relapse-free survival was somewhat better following HDAC Induction (P = .049): 33% (HDAC) versus 21% (SDAC) at 4 years for those aged less than 50, and 21% (HDAC) versus 9% (SDAC) for those aged 50 to 64. Induction with HDAC was associated with a significantly increased risk of fatal (P = .0033) and neurologic (P < .0001) toxicity. Among patients who achieved CR with SDAC, survival and disease-free survival (DFS) following consolidation randomization were not significantly better with HDAC compared with SDAC (P = .77 and .46, respectively). Patients who received both HDAC induction and consolidation had the best postremission outcomes; however, the proportion of CR patients who did not go on to protocol consolidation therapy was more than twice as high after HDAC induction compared with SDAC. Induction therapy with HDAC plus DNR was associated with greater toxicity than SDAC plus DNR, but with no improvement in CR rate or survival. Following CR induction with SDAC, consolidation with HDAC increased toxicity but not survival or DFS. In a nonrandomized comparison, patients who received both HDAC induction and consolidation had superior survival and DFS compared with those who received SDAC induction with either SDAC or HDAC consolidation.

Serum protein concentrations and lymphocyte function, were determined in prisoner volunteers undergoing prolonged biweekly plasmapheresis and appropriate control subjects. Prolonged biweekly removal of 800 ml of plasma was well tolerated clinically. Neither circulating lymphocyte counts, PHA-induced in vitro lymphocyte ³H-TdR incorporation, or delayed hypersensitivity were affected. However, mean immunoglobulin, β₁^c-globulin and albumin levels decreased significantly during the initial year of plasmapheresis and individual values were below the accepted normal minimum range in over half the donors tested. Low levels of IgG, IgA, IgM, β₁^c-globulin and albumin were also detected in several ‘normal’ prisoner volunteers. These findings suggest that individual immunoglobulin and other serum protein concentrations should be quantitated initially to eliminate poor-risk donors, and monitored at intervals during the course of plasmapheresis.

The Southwest Oncology Group analyzed outcome with cytotoxic chemotherapy for previously untreated acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) from 1982 through 1986. Results with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) prompted comparison with patients from 1986 through 1991 and analysis of factors contributing to APL results. Patient and disease characteristics and treatment outcome were compared for all evaluable patients, with more detailed analysis of factors affecting APL treatment outcome. From 1982 through 1986, median survival and disease- free survival in 45 APL patients were 106 months and greater than 105 months, respectively, versus 6 and 14 months for 417 other AML patients. Such differences were not seen from 1986 through 1991. In the 141 APL patients from 1982 through 1991, after adjusting for significant patient and disease characteristics, higher daunomycin (DNR) doses during induction were significantly associated with higher complete remission rates (P < .0001), longer survival (P < .0001), and longer DFS (P < .0001). Cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) induction dose, the inclusion of other chemotherapy agents in induction, postremission therapy (consolidation, maintenance, or bone marrow transplantation) other than DNR, APL subtype, and patient age did not appear to significantly affect outcome of APL, except for a significant detrimental effect of high-dose Ara-C in consolidation (P = .0042). Morphologic AML subtypes other than APL did not affect outcome. We conclude that high-dose DNR selectively increases survival in APL. This good survival is important for evaluation of combined all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)/chemotherapy protocols and for planning future combinations of chemotherapy and ATRA. These results illustrate the need to individualize chemotherapy for subtypes of AML. Therapeutic response of APL is independent of age. Except for APL, morphologic subclassification of AML contributed little prognostic information.

A Phase II study of Didemnin-B, a marine cyclic depsipeptide, was undertaken in patients with progressive epithelial ovarian cancer. The starting dose was 2.6 mg/m2. Fifteen patients received the drug, of whom twelve were evaluable. There were no responses observed in the twelve patients. The two most frequent toxicities were nausea and vomiting and anemia. On the basis of this trial, Didemnin-B is not felt to have significant effect with epithelial ovarian cancer.