Background In an aging population, it is important to activate older adults in taking care of their own health. Increasing physical activity is one way to avoid or lessen age-related physical and mental impairments. Interest in the use of information and communication technology (ICT) tools to promote physical activity among older adults is growing considerably. Such tools are suitable for communicating activation factors—skills, knowledge, and motivation—by integrating a variety of behavior change techniques (BCTs) to enhance physical activity. Although activation factors have been incorporated into physical activity interventions using ICT, little is known about the actual integration methods used in such interventions or about the effects of activation factors on influencing behavior change. Objective The first aim of this study was to identify which of the activation factors were covered in physical activity–promoting ICT interventions for older adults and which BCTs were used to address them. The second objective was to classify the user interaction interfaces and delivery modes that were used to promote these activation factors. Methods The search engines of PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were used to search for and identify articles examining the effectiveness of ICT interventions for promoting physical activity in older adults. References and related data were selected, extracted, and reviewed independently by 2 reviewers. The risk of bias was assessed, and any conflict was addressed by a third separate reviewer. Selected articles included older adults aged ≥55 years without pre-existing medical diseases and other physical or mental conditions that could hinder movement. Results In total, 368 records were retrieved, and 13 studies met all inclusion criteria. Articles differed in terms of themes, timescales, user interaction interfaces, and outcome measures; therefore, a quantitative data synthesis was not feasible. Motivation was the most promoted activation factor among all trials (33 times). An app and a smartwatch were used in the majority of intervention groups (7/20, 35%) for tracking physical activity and receiving personalized feedback based on the individual goals. Skills (25 times) and knowledge (17 times) were the next most commonly addressed activation factors. Face-to-face interaction was the most used approach to targeting users’ skills, including providing instructions on how to perform a behavior and exchanging knowledge via education on the health consequences of insufficient physical activity. Overall, integrating all 3 activation factors and using multiple user interaction interfaces with a variety of delivery modes proved the most effective in improving physical activity. Conclusions This study highlights commonly used BCTs and preferred modes of their delivery. So far, only a limited number of available BCTs (21/99, 21%) have been integrated. Considering their effectiveness, a larger variety of BCTs that address skills, knowledge, and motivation should be exploited in future ICT interventions.
BACKGROUND The use of information and communication technology (ICT) tools to promote physical activity among older adults is growing considerable interest. Older adults are becoming more ICT literate and their interaction with ICT tools such as websites, phones, and mobile applications, create the opportunity for these tools to be used to promote physical activation. Physical interventions can be delivered supervised, unsupervised, or facilitated and they can contain various behavioural change techniques (BCT) to equip the user with the activating factors ‘skills’, ‘knowledge’ and ‘motivation’ to change the user’s behaviour. However, in the various interventions using ICT tools to improve physical activity among older adults, usage, and effectiveness of activating factors have not yet been explored in depth. OBJECTIVE First, this study aims to identify which of the activation factors skills, knowledge and motivation were covered in the physical activity promoting ICT interventions for older adults and which BCT were used to address them. Second objective is to classify the user interaction interfaces and delivery modes, which promote these activation factors. METHODS The search engines from PubMed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect were searched to identify articles, examining the effectiveness of ICT interventions for promoting physical activity in older adults. References were selected, data extracted and reviewed independently by two reviewers. The risk of bias was assessed, and any conflict was addressed by a third separate reviewer. Selected articles included older adults aged 55 years and older without pre-existing medical diseases and other physical or mental conditions that can hinder movement. RESULTS 353 records were retrieved, and 13 studies met all inclusion criteria. Articles differed in themes, time scale, intervention interface, and outcome measures, therefore a quantitative data synthesis was not feasible. The activation factor ‘motivation’ was the most promoted from all trials (33 times). In most cases, an app and a smartwatch were used for `tracking physical activity, receiving personalised feedback based on the individual goals` to nourish motivation. After that, ‘skills’ (25 times) and ‘knowledge’ (17 times) were addressed. Face-to-face interaction was most used to target user’s skills with `instructions how to perform the behaviour` and exchange knowledge via `educating them on the health consequences of insufficient physical activity`. Overall, integrating all activation factors and using multiple intervention delivery modes especially for addressing the motivation proved most effective in improving physical activity. CONCLUSIONS This study has highlighted commonly used BCT and their preferred modes of delivery. Future studies on ICT physical interventions should combine subjective and objective outcome measures, as well as including measures for usability of the technology. These could make the results more homogeneous and suitable for meta-analysis in future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.