Six hundred sixty-six patients received 792 liver transplants between February 1, 1984 and September 30, 1991. Biliary reconstruction was by choledochocholedochostomy (CDCD) with T-tube (n = 509) or Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy (CDJ) (n = 283). Twenty-five patients (4%) developed biliary strictures. Anastomotic strictures were more common after CDJ (n = 10, 3.5%) than for CDCD (n = 3, 0.6%). Intrahepatic strictures developed in 12 patients. Six patients had occult hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT). The other six patients received grafts in which cold ischemia time exceeded 12 hours. Anastomotic strictures were successfully managed by percutaneous dilation (PD) in five patients (n = 10), operation in three (n = 6), with retransplantation required in two patients. Intrahepatic strictures were managed by PD in seven, retransplantation in one, and expectantly in four patients. Of 25 patients, 19 (76%) are alive with good graft function. In three of six deaths, the biliary stricture was a significant factor to the development of sepsis and allograft failure. The authors conclude that (1) anastomotic strictures are rare after LT; (2) the development of biliary strictures may signify occult HAT; (3) PD is effective for most strictures; and (4) extended cold graft ischemia (less than 12 hours) may be injurious to the biliary epithelium, resulting in intrahepatic stricture formation.

ObjectiveTo examine the impact of laparoscopic nephrectomy and recipient education on the proportion of kidney recipients who could identify a potential live donor, and on the live donor (LD) transplantation rate. Summary Background DataLaparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) results in less postoperative surgical pain, a shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery than the standard open donor nephrectomy (ODN). The authors hypothesized that the availability of this less invasive surgical technique would enhance the willingness of family and friends to donate. MethodsThe study population consisted of 3,298 end-stage renal disease patients referred for kidney transplant evaluation between November 1991 and February 2000, divided into three groups. The first group received no formal LD education and had only ODN available. The second group received formal education about the LD process and had only ODN available. The third group had both formal LD education and LDN available. Records were examined to determine what proportion of each group had any potential donors tissue-typed, and the rate at which they received an LD transplant. ResultsBefore LDN availability and formal LD education, only 35.1% of referrals found a potential donor, and only 12.2% received an LD transplant within 3 years. Institution of a formal education program increased the volunteer rate to 39.0%, and 16.5% received an LD transplant. When LDN became available, 50% of patients were able to find at least one potential donor, and within 3 years 24.7% received an LD transplant. Regression analysis indicated that availability of LDN was independently associated with a 1.9 relative risk of receiving an LD transplant. Kaplan-Meier death-censored 1-and 3-year graft survival rates for ODN transplants were 95.8% and 90.6%, versus 97.5% and 94.8% for LDN. ConclusionsThe availability of LDN and an LD family education program has doubled the live donor transplantation rate, and outcomes remain excellent.

A positive cross-match is not necessarily a contraindication to LD transplantation, especially for patients with low donor-specific alloantibody titers.

Background: Bleeding following liver resection continues to be a significant morbidity of the procedure. Fibrin sealants represent an improvement over conventional topical hemostatic agents, because they contain components that actively form clot. However, most available agents contain nonhuman protein, which represents an immunologic risk.