A canine model was used to investigate the efferent laryngeal responses to stimulation by topically applied acid and pepsin. Five adult mongrel dogs were studied. Electromyographic recordings from the thyroarytenoid muscle were measured with hooked-wire electrodes as an acid solution (normal saline/hydrochloric acid at pH 6.0, 5.0, 4.0, 3.0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, and 1.0) was sequentially instilled into the larynx. Laryngospasm (tonic, sustained contraction of the thyroarytenoid muscle) occurred in all animals at pH 2.5 to 2.0 or less. Control substances such as neutral pH isotonic saline, hypotonic saline, hypertonic saline, water, and pepsin alone failed to produce laryngospasm. Next, solutions containing both acid (in the same pH range) and pepsin were tested. The laryngeal responses were similar to those of acid alone. The superior laryngeal nerves were sectioned bilaterally and the above experiments repeated. None of the test solutions produced laryngospasm; however, when capsaicin (1%) was instilled into the subglottis, laryngospasm occurred. Thus, chemoreceptors in the subglottis (supplied by the recurrent laryngeal nerves) appear to be responsive to capsaicin stimulation but not to acid stimulation. The data suggest that pH-sensitive chemoreceptors in the canine larynx cause laryngospasm (when the pH of the test solution is 2.5 or less) and that these acid receptors are supplied by the superior laryngeal nerves.

Laryngomalacia is the most common cause of stridor in children. Previous studies using barium esophagrams or single-probe esophageal pH testing have indicated that 68% to 80% of infants with laryngomalacia have reflux. A recent study in a large series of pediatric patients has shown that these 2 testing modalities are relatively insensitive in detecting reflux when compared with 24-hour double-probe pH testing. This study was undertaken to determine the incidence and frequency of reflux in children with laryngomalacia by use of 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring. Twenty-four children with endoscopically diagnosed laryngomalacia underwent 24-hour double-probe pH testing. The distal probe was placed in the lower esophagus, and the proximal probe was placed just above the cricopharyngeus immediately posterior to the larynx. All 24 (100%) children had pharyngeal acid exposure as judged by the proximal pH probe. These children had a mean of 15.21 episodes of reflux to the level of the pharynx during the 24-hour study period. In contrast, only 16 (66%) children had abnormal acid exposure as measured by the distal esophageal probe. These results indicate that essentially all children with laryngomalacia have reflux of gastric acid to the pharyngeal level. Multiple authors have documented the detrimental effects of acid and the accompanying pepsin in the larynx and tracheobronchial tree. Persistent laryngeal edema is an almost universal finding in patients with reflux to the pharyngeal level and is a common finding in children with laryngomalacia. In some patients with laryngomalacia, reflux may be the primary cause of their airway compromise, whereas in others it may be a significant cofactor exacerbating a preexisting neurologic or anatomic abnormality.

Cochlear implant (CI) users are affected more than their normal hearing (NH) peers by the negative consequences of background noise on speech understanding. Research has shown that adult CI users can improve their speech recognition in challenging listening environments by using dual-microphone beamformers, such as adaptive directional microphones (ADMs) and wireless remote microphones (RMs). The suitability of these microphone technologies for use in children with CIs is not well-understood nor widely accepted.To assess the benefit of ADM or RM technology on speech perception in background noise in children and adolescents with cochlear implants (CIs) with no previous or current use of ADM or RM.Mixed, repeated measures design.Twenty (20) children, ten (10) CI users (mean age 14.3 yrs) who used Advanced Bionics HiRes90K implants with research Naida processors, and ten (10) NH age-matched controls participated in this prospective study.CI users listened with an ear-canal level microphone, T-Mic (TM), an ADM, and a wireless RM at different audio-mixing ratios. Speech understanding with five microphone settings (TM 100%, ADM, RM + TM 50/50, RM + TM 75/25, RM 100%) was evaluated in quiet and in noise.Speech perception ability was measured using children’s spondee words to obtain a speech recognition threshold for 80% accuracy (SRT80%) in 20-talker babble where the listener sat in a sound booth 1 m (3.28′) from the target speech (front) and noise (behind) to test five microphone settings (TM 100%, ADM, RM + TM 50/50, RM + TM 75/25, RM 100%). Group performance-intensity functions were computed for each listening condition to show the effects of microphone configuration with respect to signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A difference score (CI Group minus NH Group) was computed to show the effect of microphone technology at different SNRs relative to NH. Statistical analysis using a repeated-measures analysis of variance evaluated the effects of the microphone configurations on SRT80% and performance at SNRs. Between-groups analysis of variance was used to compare the CI group with the NH group.The speech recognition was significantly poorer for children with CI than children with NH in quiet and in noise when using the TM alone. Adding the ADM or RM provided a significant improvement in speech recognition for the CI group over use of the TM alone in noise (mean dB advantage ranged from 5.8 for ADM to 16 for RM100). When children with CI used the RM75 or RM100 in background babble, speech recognition was not statistically different from the group with NH.Speech recognition in noise performance improved with the use of ADM and RM100 or RM75 over TM-only for children with CIs. Alhough children with CI remain at a disadvantage as compared with NH children in quiet and more favorable SNRs, microphone technology can enhance performance for some children with CI to match that of NH peers in contexts with negative SNRs.

No abstract