This article explores how primary features of occupational restructuring, such as the feminization of employment and migration, and changes in patterns of residential mobility of Greek and migrant women since the 1990s have contributed to shaping new forms of sociospatial segregation in Athens. We examine changes in the occupational structure and in segregation indices from 1991 to 2001. Findings suggest that new gender and ethnic divisions in the occupational structure combine with residential mobility and introduce strong tendencies towards spatial fragmentation. Intra-urban and migratory flows reflect diversified occupational trajectories among women and contribute to shaping the socioeconomic profile of the destination areas: (a) migrant domestic and unskilled service workers locate to central city and suburban areas; (b) Greek managers and professionals, move to ‘upper-class suburbs’; (c) small Greek entrepreneurs and independent workers sprawl to peri-urban areas; (d) salespersons and clerks move to inner suburban areas.

This paper draws attention to the socio-spatial diversity of immigrant groups in Athens by investigating their changing hierarchical position in both society and space. The varying demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the immigrant population generate hierarchies of immigrant groups, which are reflected in intricate ways in the residential distribution of immigrants in the metropolitan area. Diversity seems to be interconnected with hierarchically unequal social positions, and these positions are in turn interconnected with the transformation of the spatial hierarchy in the Greek capital. This hierarchical diversity is expressed by a spatial typology of immigrants’ locations in Athens. The paper ultimately explores how this typology tends to alter the urban social ecology (in terms of socio-ethnic composition of distinct spatial clusters) and the urban structural dynamics (in terms of interactions between different ethnic and social groups) in an increasingly unequal city.

With this paper we examine the 2004 Olympic Games as an ambivalent catalyst for the implementation of neoliberal urban policies in Athens. We draw upon two distinct analytical streams: first, regulationist scholars' conception of neoliberalization as a pathdependent and, to a large extent, state-led process, and, second, Skocpol's 'autonomy state' approach. We argue that the implementation of neoliberal urban policies in Athens has been shaped by a combination of centralism, low central state capacity, organizational and financial weakness of business elites, and citizen movements' opposition. We first provide an overview of Athenian urban policies since the 1960s; then we examine the preparation of the 2004 Olympic Games; and, finally, we investigate the post-Olympic use of Olympic venues, including the period of the current sovereign debt crisis. In the conclusion we emphasize that the bailout agreement between Greece and the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank, and the European Union aims at reboosting neoliberal public policies in a radical way.1 Introduction 'Megaevents' and 'megaprojects' have been widely used during the last decades as major tools for fostering urban development in advanced capitalist societies. This strategy is linked to internationally diffused planning models that emphasize the positioning of primate cities of the nation-states in the global urban hierarchy as the key of regional and country development. In this paper we focus on the case of the 2004 Olympic Games. We examine how the Games and the related megaprojects have been linked to a competitive city strategy and how this strategy has been fashioned by local political conditions.We begin with an overview of the critical discussion on neoliberalization of urban policies, focusing on the issues of path dependency and the role of the state. We argue that this approach may be seminally linked to Skocpol's notion of state capacity in order to examine the modalities and outcomes of promoting neoliberal policies by different states. We then discuss the postwar urban policies in Athens, stressing the persistence of centralism and the reproduction of low state capacity. Finally, we investigate the preparation of the Games and

No abstract

No abstract