Introduction : C‐Guard carotid stent is a self‐expandable open cell stent covered with a double‐layer mesh which was developed for the treatment of internal carotid artery disease. Lower procedural and complications rates, as well as lower post‐operative infarctions are some advantages of this device. Nevertheless, the use of C‐Guard in the treatment of cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms is scarce. Therefore, we present two cases in which the C‐Guard stent achieved complete angiographic occlusion at follow‐up. Methods : We identified two cases in which the C‐Guard carotid stent was used to treat symptomatic cervical ICA aneurysms. Angiographic follow‐up was performed. Results : Case 1: 47‐yo female presented left‐sided motor deficit. CT showed ischemic areas in the right hemisphere and CTA demonstrated an unruptured aneurysm in the C1 segment of the right ICA. The patient started dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel. A 6mm x 40 mm C‐Guard carotid stent was deployed without complications. One‐year follow‐up CTA showed complete obliteration of the aneurysm with reconstruction of the ICA. Case 2: 38‐yo male presented decreased left visual acuity. CTA and DSA showed an unruptured aneurysm in the C1 segment of the ICA. The patient started DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel. A 7mm x 30 mm C‐Guard carotid stent was deployed without complications. Three‐month follow‐up DSA showed complete obliteration of the aneurysm with adequate filling of distal vessels. Conclusions : C‐Guard stent is a potential alternative to conventional carotid stents in the treatment of cervical ICA aneurysms with high obliteration rates at follow‐up.

Introduction : The transradial approach (TRA) has gained acceptance among interventionists due to the lower operative complication rates, less operative time and better patient comfort. Our study aimed to analyze our experience in the implementation of the TRA for diagnostic cerebral angiographies. Methods : Between March 2020 and July 2021, consecutive patients who underwent TRA in two institutions were selected and data was retrospectively collected. Demographics, technical details of the procedure, duration of the procedure, fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure were analyzed. Results : A total of 76 angiographies using the TRA were done. The mean age was 47.5 ± 16.8 years (8 – 82 years). Women represented 57% of cases. Successful radial artery (RA) catheterization was done in 94% (85 patients/80 successful). A preoperative cocktail was used in all the cases. Subcutaneous lidocaine and a 5F sheath were used in 46% and 57% of cases, respectively. The Simmons 2 catheter was used in all the cases. Glidecath, followed by Merit were used in 40% and 32% of the cases, respectively. Right internal carotid artery (ICA), left ICA, right vertebral artery (VA), left VA, right external carotid artery (ECA) and left ECA were studied in 95%, 91%, 76%, 20%, 20% and 15% of the cases, respectively. Post‐operative vasospasm occurred in 29% of the cases, which resolved with intra‐arterial verapamil. Vasospasm was not associated with sheath diameter (p = 0.129) or local anesthesia (p = 0.065). The mean fluoroscopy time was 16 minutes. Conversion to TFA was done in 9 patients (10.6%), of which the RA was successfully catheterized in 4 patients: 1 patient had an atheroma in the brachial artery, 1 patient had a thrombus in the subclavian artery and 2 patients presented severe pain in the forearm. In the remaining 5 patients, there were 2 radial dissections and in 3 the RA could not be approached. Conclusions : The TRA is a safe and effective alternative to perform diagnostic cerebral angiographies with conversion rates according to the literature. The use of appropriate catheters is necessary in order to lower fluoroscopy times when this technique is chosen.

Introduction : Telemedicine coupled with teleproctoring have been a novel practice in the last months given the restrictive mobilization orders worldwide due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, generating the impossibility to travel and learn new techniques or bring a proctor to perform procedures on‐site. Previous papers have reported the benefits of remote proctoring for endovascular procedures using online platforms, whereas others proposed the use of more simple platforms and applications for telemedicine such as Zoom Ò , WhatsApp Ò or Google Glass Ò . Our study aimed to describe our experience in the implementation of remote learning for endovascular treatment of vascular lesions using a multicamera system streamed by a web‐based platform. Methods : Endovascular treatment of aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, and chronic subdural hematomas were streamed through a multicamera system installed in the angiosuite and shared via Zoom® platform. Four main cameras projected the angiography monitors, the operator’s hands and the overview of the room. Results : Eleven cases were performed. Aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations and chronic subdural hematomas were treated by endovascular means. Preoperative angiographic setup, intraoperative endovascular technique and postoperative management were discussed during the live streaming. No technical problems were reported. Conclusions : Remote learning with online platforms is nowadays an important tool but not a substitute to hands‐on learning for endovascular procedures. We recommend its implementation during the COVID‐19 pandemic as a temporary substitute especially for trainees who do not have access to advanced endovascular interventions.