No abstract

The pharmacologic and kinetic characteristics of sodium-dependent uptake of [3H]L-glutamate, [3H]D-aspartate, and [3H]L-aspartate into crude synaptosomal preparations of rat corpus striatum and cerebellum have been examined in vitro. In cerebellum the apparent Kts and Vmax for the three excitatory amino acids were identical whereas in striatal synaptosomes, the Vmax for [3H]L-glutamate was 30% greater (P less than or equal to .001) than for [3H]D-aspartate and 50% greater (P less than or equal to .001) than for [3H]L-aspartate. L-Amino adipic acid inhibited the uptake of the three amino acids in both regions of brain was 15- to 20-fold more potent in cerebellum than in striatum. In contrast, dihydrokainic acid inhibited transport processes in the corpus striatum but was without activity in cerebellar preparations. The neurotoxin kainic acid blocked only a portion (60%) of [3H]L-glutamate and [3H]D-aspartate uptake in cerebellum while completely inhibiting amino acid transport in corpus striatum. Three days post kainic acid lesion, [3H]D-aspartate uptake was attenuated more than [3H]L-glutamate uptake in the corpus striatum; destruction of corticostriatal afferents reduced [3H]L-glutamate to a greater extent than [3H]D-aspartate. Various lesions of the cerebellum affected excitatory amino acid transport processes to a similar extent. These results suggest that excitatory amino acid transport systems are pharmacologically distinct in different brain regions and may be heterogeneous within a single region.

The effects of the competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists CPP (5 & 10 mg/kg) and NPC 12626 (25 & 40 mg/kg) and the noncompetitive NMDA antagonists phencyclidine (1, 3, & 6.25 mg/kg) and MK 801 (0.1 & 0.2 mg/kg) on performance of rats on a nonspatial delayed matching-to-sample working memory task were evaluated. At the highest dose, each NMDA antagonist reduced choice accuracy at all retention intervals. In contrast, the reference anticholinergic agent scopolamine selectively reduced accuracy at long retention intervals, suggesting that scopolamine but not the NMDA antagonists directly interfered with time-dependent working memory retention. Propranolol, diazepam, and phenylisopropyladenosine had little or no effect on choice accuracy, suggesting that noradrenergic, gamma-aminobutyric acid-diazepam, and adenosine receptors may be relatively unimportant for working memory performance as assessed in this task. The NMDA antagonists also differed from scopolamine in that doses of NMDA antagonists that reduced response accuracy also reduced response probability, altered bias (competitive antagonists only), and increased intertrial interval responding (noncompetitive antagonists only). It was concluded that NMDA antagonists disrupt cognitive functions including, but not limited to, those required for accurate working memory performance.