Although immunization against amyloid- (A) holds promise as a disease-modifying therapy for Alzheimer disease (AD), it is associated with an undesirable accumulation of amyloid in the cerebrovasculature [i.e., cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA)] and a heightened risk of micro-hemorrhages. The central and peripheral mechanisms postulated to modulate amyloid with anti-A immunotherapy remain largely elusive. Here, we compared the effects of prolonged intracerebroventricular (icv) versus systemic delivery of anti-A antibodies on the behavioral and pathological changes in an aged Tg2576 mouse model of AD. Prolonged icv infusions of anti-A antibodies dose-dependently reduced the parenchymal plaque burden, astrogliosis, and dystrophic neurites at doses 10-to 50-fold lower than used with systemic delivery of the same antibody. Both icv and systemic anti-A antibodies reversed the behavioral impairment in contextual fear conditioning. More importantly, unlike systemically delivered anti-A antibodies that aggravated vascular pathology, icv-infused antibodies globally reduced CAA and associated micro-hemorrhages. We present data suggesting that the divergent effects of icv-delivered anti-A antibodies result from gradually engaging the local (i.e., central) mechanisms for amyloid clearance, distinct from the mechanisms engaged by high doses of anti-A antibodies that circulate in the vasculature following systemic delivery. With robust efficacy in reversing AD-related pathology and an unexpected benefit in reducing CAA and associated micro-hemorrhages, icv-targeted passive immunotherapy offers a promising therapeutic approach for the long-term management of AD.Alzheimer disease ͉ passive immunotherapy ͉ vascular amyloid ͉ microglia ͉ peripheral sink
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.