No abstract

Intravenous contrast media are widely used in MR imaging of the brain. Clinical utility is high in both neoplastic and non-neoplastic disease. The agents approved to date are all gadolinium chelates, with extracellular distribution and renal excretion. The agents differ in regard to the maximum dose that can be administered and the theoretical safety margin. When administered at the same dose, the efficacy of the different available agents is comparable. Described in the following review article are the diagnostic use of contrast media and the patterns of enhancement encountered in neoplastic disease, infection, vascular disorders, and diseases of white matter. Only in congenital brain disease, when acute abnormalities are not suspected clinically and neoplastic disease is not a question, is contrast enhancement not indicated. The gadolinium chelates play a major role in the evaluation of patients by MR with known or suspected brain disease. These agents improve both the sensitivity and specificity of the examination. In many cases, lesions cannot be identified before contrast administration. Lesion delineation, assessment of lesion activity, and differential diagnosis are all improved, in general, with the addition of postcontrast scans. The scope of applications continues to expand as the modality and clinical experience matures.

Acute spinal cord injury in a rat model is well visualized on pre- and postcontrast MR scans at 1.5 T. Observation of T2 changes and disruption of the blood-spinal cord barrier provide markers for temporal assessment of spinal cord injury in the rat model.

Twenty‐eight patients with squamous carcinomas of the base tongue were seen and evaluated in a conjoint Head and Neck Tumor Board at Stanford between 1976 and 1982. Fourteen patients were treated by combined external beam and interstitial irradiation, 11 of whom had Stage III and IV carcinomas (American Joint Committee). An initial dose of 5000 to 5500 rad was first delivered by external beam irradiation in 5 to 5.5 weeks, followed approximately 3 weeks later by an iridium 192 (192Ir) interstitial implant boost by the trocar and loop technique. The key to successful treatment of these neoplasms was found to be the use of a lateral percutaneous cervical technique, which placed horizontal loops through the oropharyngeal wall above and below the hyoid bone; the superior loop included the pharyngoepiglottic fold and the tonsilloglossal groove. Standard multiple loop implants (submentally inserted) of the base tongue from the vallecula anteriorly to the circumvallate papillae were also used routinely. This approach has been successful, since 10 of the 14 patients (71%) remain without evidence of disease (mean follow‐up, 32 months). There have been only two local recurrences, both on the pharyngoepiglottic fold in patients who did not receive the now standard pharyngoepiglottic fold/lateral pharyngeal wall implants. No patients have relapsed after 18 months. The other 14 patients were treated prospectively during the same period by combining initial resection, radical neck dissection, and postoperative irradiation. In this group, there were more locoregional failures compared to the group treated with radiation therapy alone (5 tongue recurrences and 7 neck relapses); in addition, more severe complications were noted in these 14 patients who received surgery and postoperative irradiation. The authors believe that combined external beam and interstitial irradiation is effective treatment for base tongue carcinomas, especially when the high‐dose distribution includes the adjacent tonsilloglossal groove, pharyngoepiglottic fold, and oropharyngeal wall to and below the level of the hyoid bone, in addition to treating an adequate base tongue volume.

No abstract