Microbubbles (1–10 μm diameter) have been used as conventional ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) for applications in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging. Nanobubbles (<1 μm diameter) have recently been proposed as potential extravascular UCAs that can extravasate from the leaky vasculature of tumors or sites of inflammation. However, the echogenicity of nanobubbles for CEUS remains controversial owing to prior studies that have shown very low ultrasound backscatter. We hypothesize that microbubble contamination in nanobubble formulations may explain the discrepancy. To test our hypothesis, we examined the size distributions of lipid-coated nanobubble and microbubble suspensions using multiple sizing techniques, examined their echogenicity in an agar phantom with fundamental-mode CEUS at 7 MHz and 330 kPa peak negative pressure, and interpreted our results with simulations of the modified Rayleigh–Plesset model. We found that nanobubble formulations contained a small contamination of microbubbles. Once the contribution from these microbubbles is removed from the acoustic backscatter, the acoustic contrast of the nanobubbles was shown to be near noise levels. This result indicates that nanobubbles have limited utility as UCAs for CEUS.

Microbubbles (1–10 µm diameter) have been used as conventional ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) for applications in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging. Nanobubbles (<1 µm diameter) have recently been proposed as potential extravascular UCAs that can extravasate from the leaky vasculature of tumors or sites of inflammation. However, the echogenicity of nanobubbles for CEUS remains controversial owing to prior studies that have shown very low ultrasound backscatter. We hypothesize that microbubble contamination in nanobubble formulations may explain the discrepancy. To test our hypothesis, we examined the size distributions of lipid-coated nanobubble and microbubble suspensions using multiple sizing techniques, examined their echogenicity in an agar phantom with fundamental-mode CEUS at 7 MHz and 330 kPa peak negative pressure, and interpreted our results with simulations of the modified Rayleigh-Plesset model. We found that nanobubble formulations contained a small contamination of microbubbles. Once the contribution from these microbubbles is removed from the acoustic backscatter, the acoustic contrast of the nanobubbles was shown to be near noise levels. This result indicates that nanobubbles have limited utility as UCAs for CEUS.