No abstract

Background Current conflicting information on the innervation of the human oral cavity indicates technical problems such as different detectability of the neural structures according to the various staining methods used and difficulties in reproducibility. The possibility of intraoral regional differences has not been properly considered. Methods Human biopsies of mucosa from different intraoral regions were prepared for immunohistochemistry using protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5; a marker for neuronal structures). Results Nerves were found consistently in all the biopsies. The neural pattern showed clear regional differences. Intraepithelial nerve fibers were found in the gingiva, labia, palate, within certain fungiform papillae, and in some salivary excretory ducts. Organized nerve endings were found in varying frequencies in all but one (sublingual) region, appearing as lamellar (Meissner‐like), coiled or glomerular neural structures. Merkel cell‐neurite complexes were observed in the buccal, gingival, and palatal epithelia. Immunoreactive cells with many similarities to Merkel cells but without a neural connection were also encountered. Conclusions Conflicting results from earlier innervation studies of the oral cavity could be attributed to regional innervation differences. The distribution of the nerves also casts doubt on some of the present theories concerning the function(s) of intraoral nerves, such as the free nerve endings and the Merkel cell‐neurite complexes. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

No abstract

No abstract

Objective To study the number of taste buds and, with the use of specific markers for peripheral nervous tissue, to study the neuronal pattern in taste buds from 36 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), 19 renal transplant recipients, and 40 healthy subjects. Of the patients with CRF, 17 patients had not started dialysis, 12 patients were on peritoneal dialysis, and 7 patients were on hemodialysis. Design From all subjects, two or three fungiform papillae were collected from the anterior part of the tongue. Cryostat sections were cut and inspected under light microscopy to determine the presence of taste buds. The sections were subsequently incubated with primary rabbit antibodies against protein gene product 9.5, substance P, and nerve growth factor receptor. Results Using these antibodies, no differences between the groups were observed. However, patients with CRF had fewer taste buds than control subjects. Conclusion No immunohistochemical differences were observed between patients with CRF and healthy controls. However, patients with CRF had significantly fewer fungiform taste buds, suggesting an important factor contributing to the well-known impairment of taste acuity in this patient group.