Ischaemia–reperfusion injury (IRI) in the liver, a major complication of haemorrhagic shock, resection and transplantation, is a dynamic process that involves the two interrelated phases of local ischaemic insult and inflammation-mediated reperfusion injury. This Review highlights the latest mechanistic insights into innate–adaptive immune crosstalk and cell activation cascades that lead to inflammation-mediated injury in livers stressed by ischaemia–reperfusion, discusses progress in large animal experiments and examines efforts to minimize liver IRI in patients who have received a liver transplant. The interlinked signalling pathways in multiple hepatic cell types, the IRI kinetics and positive versus negative regulatory loops at the innate–adaptive immune interface are discussed. The current gaps in our knowledge and the pathophysiology aspects of IRI in which basic and translational research is still required are stressed. An improved appreciation of cellular immune events that trigger and sustain local inflammatory responses, which are ultimately responsible for organ injury, is fundamental to developing innovative strategies for treating patients who have received a liver transplant and developed ischaemia–reperfusion inflammation and organ dysfunction.

No abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS Excellent single-center outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and liver transplantation (LT) for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma caused the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) to offer a standardized model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception for this disease. We analyzed data from multiple centers to determine the effectiveness of this treatment and the appropriateness of the MELD exception. METHODS We collected and analyzed data from 12 large-volume transplant centers in the US who met the inclusion criteria of treating three or more patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma using neoadjuvant therapy followed by liver transplantation from 1993–2010 (n=287 total patients). Center-specific protocols and medical charts were reviewed on-site. RESULTS The patients completed external radiation (99%), brachytherapy (75%), radio-sensitizing (98%), and/or maintenance chemotherapy (65%). Seventy-one patients dropped out before liver transplantation (rate of 11.5% in 3 months). Intent-to-treat survival was 68% and 53%, 2 and 5 years after therapy, respectively; post-transplantation, recurrence-free survival rates were 78% and 65%, respectively. Patients outside the UNOS criteria (those with tumor mass >3 cm, trans-peritoneal tumor biopsy, or metastatic disease) or with a prior malignancy had significantly shorter survival times (P<.001). There were no differences in outcomes among patients based on differences in operative staging or brachytherapy. Although most patients came from 1 center (n=193), the other 11 centers had similar survival times after therapy. CONCLUSION Patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who were treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by liver transplantation at 12 US centers had a 65% rate of recurrence-free survival after 5 years, demonstrating this therapy to be highly effective. An 11.5% dropout rate after 3.5 months of therapy indicates the appropriateness of the MELD exception. Rigorous selection is important for the continued success of this treatment.

More than 50% of LT recipients survive 20 years, achieve important socioeconomic milestones, and report quality of life superior to patients with liver disease or other chronic conditions. LT is a durable surgery that restores both long-term physiologic and psychologic well-being in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Although previous consensus recommendations have helped define patients who would benefit from simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLK), there is a current need to reassess published guidelines for SLK because of continuing increase in proportion of liver transplant candidates with renal dysfunction and ongoing donor organ shortage. The purpose of this consensus meeting was to critically evaluate published and registry data regarding patient and renal outcomes following liver transplantation alone or SLK in liver transplant recipients with renal dysfunction. Modifications to the current guidelines for SLK and a research agenda were proposed.