Background information. Motile activity of tumour cells is regarded as a critical factor determining their metastatic potential. We have shown previously that contrary to the majority of normal cells, homotypic contacts between some tumour cells, among them low metastatic (AT-2) and highly metastatic (MAT-LyLu) rat prostate cancer cells, increase the speed of their movements. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of heterotypic cell-to-cell contacts on the migration of rat prostate cancer cells differing in metastatic potential, and to correlate it with the intensity of homo-and heterologous gap junctional coupling.Results. MAT-LyLu and AT-2 cells moving on the surface of fibroblasts displayed significantly greater cell displacement than those moving on plastic substrata. This effect correlated with the polarization (contact guidance) and increased speed of cell movements. However, in contrast with the migration on plastic substrata, where MAT-LyLu cells displayed considerably higher motility than AT-2 cells, no differences between both cell lines were observed on the surface of fibroblasts. On the other hand, in contrast with AT-2, Mat-LyLu cells displayed extensive homologous coupling mediated by connexin43 and were able to couple with normal fibroblasts. Conclusion.Heterotypic contacts between migrating prostatic cancer cells and normal fibroblasts can strongly stimulate their migration during invasion; however, this effect does not correlate with the gap junctional coupling between cancer cells and normal fibroblasts.

No abstract

No abstract

Bone marrow-derived cells are thought to participate and enhance the healing process contributing to skin cells or releasing regulatory cytokines. Directional cell migration in a weak direct current electric field (DC-EF), known as electrotaxis, may be a way of cell recruitment to the wound site. Here we examined the influence of electric field on bone marrow adherent cells (BMACs) and its potential role as a factor attracting mesenchymal stem cells to cutaneous wounds. We observed that in an external EF, BMAC movement was accelerated and highly directed with distinction of two cell populations migrating toward opposite poles: mesenchymal stem cells migrated toward the cathode, whereas macrophages toward the anode. Analysis of intracellular pathways revealed that macrophage electrotaxis mostly depended on Rho family small GTPases and calcium ions, but interruption of PI3K and Arp2/3 had the most pronounced effect on electrotaxis of MSCs. However, in all cases we observed only a partial decrease in directionality of cell movement after inhibition of certain proteins. Additionally, although we noticed the accumulation of EGFR at the cathodal side of MSCs, it was not involved in electrotaxis. Moreover, the cell reaction to EF was very dynamic with first symptoms occurring within <1min. In conclusion, the physiological DC-EF may act as a factor positioning bone marrow cells within a wound bed and the opposite direction of MSC and macrophage movement did not result either from utilizing different signalling or redistribution of investigated cell surface receptors.