BackgroundChecklists are common in some medical fields, including surgery, intensive care and emergency medicine. They can be an effective tool to improve care processes and reduce mortality and morbidity. Despite the seemingly rapid acceptance and dissemination of the checklist, there are few studies describing the actual process of developing and implementing such tools in health care. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences from checklist development and implementation in a group of non-medical, high reliability organisations (HROs).MethodA qualitative study based on key informant interviews and field visits followed by a Delphi approach. Eight informants, each with 10-30 years of checklist experience, were recruited from six different HROs.ResultsThe interviews generated 84 assertions and recommendations for checklist implementation. To achieve checklist acceptance and compliance, there must be a predefined need for which a checklist is considered a well suited solution. The end-users ("sharp-end") are the key stakeholders throughout the development and implementation process. Proximity and ownership must be assured through a thorough and wise process. All informants underlined the importance of short, self-developed, and operationally-suited checklists. Simulation is a valuable and widely used method for training, revision, and validation.ConclusionChecklists have been a cornerstone of safety management in HROs for nearly a century, and are becoming increasingly popular in medicine. Acceptance and compliance are crucial for checklist implementation in health care. Experiences from HROs may provide valuable input to checklist implementation in healthcare.

BackgroundAccidental hypothermia increases mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. Various methods for insulating and wrapping hypothermic patients are used worldwide. The aim of this study was to compare the thermal insulating effects and comfort of bubble wrap, ambulance blankets / quilts, and Hibler's method, a low-cost method combining a plastic outer layer with an insulating layer.MethodsEight volunteers were dressed in moistened clothing, exposed to a cold and windy environment then wrapped using one of the three different insulation methods in random order on three different days. They were rested quietly on their back for 60 minutes in a cold climatic chamber. Skin temperature, rectal temperature, oxygen consumption were measured, and metabolic heat production was calculated. A questionnaire was used for a subjective evaluation of comfort, thermal sensation, and shivering.ResultsSkin temperature was significantly higher 15 minutes after wrapping using Hibler's method compared with wrapping with ambulance blankets / quilts or bubble wrap. There were no differences in core temperature between the three insulating methods. The subjects reported more shivering, they felt colder, were more uncomfortable, and had an increased heat production when using bubble wrap compared with the other two methods. Hibler's method was the volunteers preferred method for preventing hypothermia. Bubble wrap was the least effective insulating method, and seemed to require significantly higher heat production to compensate for increased heat loss.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that a combination of vapour tight layer and an additional dry insulating layer (Hibler's method) is the most efficient wrapping method to prevent heat loss, as shown by increased skin temperatures, lower metabolic rate and better thermal comfort. This should then be the method of choice when wrapping a wet patient at risk of developing hypothermia in prehospital environments.

SummaryThe domestic pig is a useful model in certain areas of biomedical research. Effective use of this species is often encumbered by lack of reference values in conscious as well as anaesthetized animals. Anaesthesia itself influences physiological and biological variables; the anaesthetic technique often affects experimental results. The relationship between anaesthesia and haemodynamics is well characterized in man, but less established in pigs.We studied the effect of midazolam-fentanyl-isoflurane anaesthesia in six immature, male, domestic pigs (Norwegian landrace). Haemodynamic variables (heart rate, arterial systolic, mean, diastolic pressures, pulmonary systolic, mean, diastolic pressures, pulmonary capillary wedge pressurel, tissue perfusion, lymph flow (thoracic duct) were recorded for 3 h in animals with open chest through midline sternotomy.Variables relevant to fluid balance, e.g. interstitial hydrostatic pressure (Pil, serum-colloid osmotic pressure (s-COP) and serum-albumin (s-albumin) and -protein Is-protein) concentrations were measured.With the chosen anaesthetic technique haemodynamic variables, including lymph flow, and laboratory variables remained constant during the study period. Most variables were similar to conditions in humans. In contrast to adult humans exposed to the same anaesthetic technique, these pigs had lower haemoglobin-, s-albumin-and s-protein concentrations. A finding which may reflect immaturity. Liver and lung perfusion decreased significantly during the study period whereas perfusion of the other organs studied remained constant. Lack of responses to defined noxious stimuli during the study period suggest adequate analgesia. We conclude that midazolam, fentanyl and isoflurane provide cardiovascular stability including normal microvascular fluid exchange, which are essential elements for securing the quality of results obtained during cardiovascular research in anaesthetized pigs.