DNA intercalating agents such as 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide (m-AMSA) have previously been found to induce in mammalian cells the formation of protein-associated DNA single- and double-strand breaks. In the current work, an activity characterized by the production of DNA-protein links associated with DNA strand breaks and by stimulation by m-AMSA was isolated from L1210 cell nuclei and was shown to be due to topoisomerase II. Nuclei were extracted with 0.35 M NaCl, and the extract was fractionated by gel filtration, DNA-cellulose chromatography, and glycerol gradient centrifugation. A rapid filter binding assay was devised to monitor the fractionation procedure on the basis of DNA-protein linking activity. The active DNA-cellulose fraction contained both topoisomerase I and topoisomerase II whereas the glycerol gradient purified material contained only topoisomerase II activity. The properties of the active material were studied at both stages of purification. m-AMSA enhanced the formation of complexes between purified topoisomerase II and SV40 DNA in which the DNA sustained a single- or double-strand cut and the enzyme was covalently linked to the 5' terminus of the DNA. This action was further enhanced by ATP, as well as by nonhydrolyzable ATP analogues. m-AMSA inhibited the topoisomerization and catenation reactions of topoisomerase II, probably because of trapping of the enzyme-DNA complexes. The activity showed a dependence on the type of DNA intercalators used, analogous to what was previously observed in intact cells. m-AMSA had no effect on topoisomerase I.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

DNA topoisomerase II is believed to be the enzyme that produces the protein-associated DNA strand breaks observed in mammalian cell nuclei treated with various intercalating agents. Two intercalators--4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide (m-AMSA, amsacrine) and 2-methyl-9-hydroxyellipticinium (2-Me-9-OH-E+)--differ in their effects on protein-associated double-strand breaks in isolated nuclei. m-AMSA stimulates their production at all concentrations, whereas 2-Me-9-OH-E+ stimulates at low concentrations and inhibits at high concentrations. We have reproduced these differential effects in experiments carried out in vitro with purified L1210 DNA topoisomerase II, and we have found that concentrations of 2-Me-9-OH-E+ above 5 microM prevent the trapping of DNA-topoisomerase II cleavable complexes irrespective of the presence of m-AMSA. It also stimulated topoisomerase II mediated DNA strand passage, again with or without inhibitory amounts of m-AMSA (this result suggests that extensive intercalation by 2-Me-9-OH-E+ destabilized the cleavable complexes). From these data, it is concluded that intercalator-induced protein-associated DNA strand breaks observed in intact eukaryotic cells and isolated nuclei are generated by DNA topoisomerase II and that intercalators can affect mammalian DNA topoisomerase II in more than one way. They can trap cleavable complexes and inhibit DNA topoisomerase II mediated DNA relaxation (m-AMSA and low concentrations of 2-Me-9-OH-E+) or destabilize cleavable complexes and stimulate DNA relaxation (high concentrations of 2-Me-9-OH-E+).

No abstract

The immune response to a variety of synthetic and natural antigens is under the control of genes present within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), and many of the responses are mediated by thymus-derived lymphocytes (1–3). These immune response (Ir) genes may code for cell-surface structures that are capable of specific antigen recognition, either by direct interaction with the antigen or by conformational changes in association with other cell surface structures (1, 2). The specificity of the proposed Ir gene product on the T cell has been examined by comparing the cross-reactivities of antibodies and of sensitized cells elicited by immunization with branched synthetic polypeptide antigens. McDevitt and his co-workers have presented evidence that the in vitro recognition of antigen by T cells in the mouse is more specific than either antibody cross-reactivity or antigen binding by B cells (4, 5). Similar results were obtained in the rat by comparing the cross-reactions of anti-polypeptide antibodies and the in vitro antigen-induced proliferative response (6).