Background and Objectives: he treatment of large bone defects in geriatric patients often presents a major surgical challenge because of age-related bone loss. In such patients, the scarcity of healthy makes autologous grafting techniques hard to perform. On the one hand, clinicians’ fear of possible infections limits using bone substitute materials (BSM). On the other hand, BSM is limitless and spares patients another surgery to harvest autologous material. Materials and Methods: To address the aptness of BSM in geriatric patients, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients over the age of 64 years who visited our clinic between the years 2011–2018. The study assessed postoperative complications clinically and healing results radiologically. The study included 83 patients with bone defects at the distal radius, proximal humerus, and proximal tibia. The defect zones were filled with BSM based on either nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NHA) or calcium phosphate (CP). For comparison, a reference group (empty defect, ED) without the void filling with a BSM was also included. Results: 106 patients sustained traumatic fractures of the distal radius (71.7%), proximal humerus (5.7%), and proximal tibia (22.6%). No difference was found between the BSM groups in infection occurrence (p = 1.0). Although not statistically significant, the BSM groups showed a lower rate of pseudarthrosis (p = 0.09) compared with the ED group. Relative risk (RR) of complications was 32.64% less in the BSM groups compared with the ED group. The additional beneficial outcome of BSM was demonstrated by calculating the number needed to treat (NNT). The calculation showed that with every six patients treated, at least one complication could be avoided. Radiological assessment of bone healing showed significant improvement in the bridging of the defect zone (p < 0.001) when BSM was used. Conclusions: In contrast to previous studies, the study showed that BSM could support bone healing and does not present an infection risk in geriatric patients. The NNT calculation indicates a wider potential benefit of BSM.

When bone substitutes materials are used, the increased risk of infection due to the none-autogenic graft is often discussed. The treatment of large bone defects in geriatric patients, often with osteoporotic bone, often presents major challenges to surgery. Bone substitutes materials are available indefinitely without the risk of additional surgery in each patient. Can bone substitutes materials be used without hesitation in the geriatric patient? Eighty-three patients suffered traumatic fractures of the distal radius, proximal humerus, and proximal tibia. The defect zones were filled with bone substitute material based on nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NHA) or calcium phosphate (CP). For comparison, a reference group without the void filling with a bone graft substitute (void defects, ED) was studied. All patients over the age of 64 years were retrospectively evaluated for complications and radiological outcomes. Results: 106 patients sustained traumatic fractures of the distal radius (68.9%), proximal humerus (5.7%), and proximal tibia (22.6%). No differences in infections were found when comparing the groups (p=1.0). retrospectively evaluated. The KEM group had a nonsignificantly lower rate of pseudarthrosis (p=0.09). A relative risk (RR) reduction of complications of 32.64% was observed when bone grafting material was used. The NNT for the prevention of complications was 5.99. When bone healing was assessed by radiological images, some follow-up studies showed significant differences in fracture bridging (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: In contrast to previous studies, bone substitutes materials can support the healing process in geriatric patients without relevant disadvantages. With an NNT of 6 regarding complications, many patients could benefit from bone graft augmentation. No increased infection rate was observed.

When bone substitutes materials are used, the increased risk of infection due to the none-autogenic graft is often discussed. The treatment of large bone defects in geriatric patients, often with osteoporotic bone, often presents major challenges to surgery. Bone substitutes materials are available indefinitely without the risk of additional surgery in each patient. Can bone substitutes materials be used without hesitation in the geriatric patient?Eighty-three patients suffered traumatic fractures of the distal radius, proximal humerus, and proximal tibia. The defect zones were filled with bone substitute material based on nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NHA) or calcium phosphate (CP). For comparison, a reference group without the void filling with a bone graft substitute (void defects, ED) was studied. All patients over the age of 64 years were retrospectively evaluated for complications and radiological outcomes. Results: 106 patients sustained traumatic fractures of the distal radius (68.9%), proximal humerus (5.7%), and proximal tibia (22.6%). No differences in infections were found when comparing the groups (p=1.0). retrospectively evaluated. The KEM group had a nonsignificantly lower rate of pseudarthrosis (p=0.09). A relative risk (RR) reduction of complications of 32.64% was observed when bone grafting material was used. The NNT for the prevention of complications was 5.99. When bone healing was assessed by radiological images, some follow-up studies showed significant differences in fracture bridging (p&lt;0.001).Conclusions: In contrast to previous studies, bone substitutes materials can support the healing process in geriatric patients without relevant disadvantages. With an NNT of 6 regarding complications, many patients could benefit from bone graft augmentation. No increased infection rate was observed.

Interessenkonflikt. J. Pawelke und G. Knapp geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen Abb. 1 8 a und b Initiale konventionelle Röntgendarstellungen (ex domo) mit anteriorer Luxation der Tibia, c präoperative Angiographie mit Kontrastmittelverlust der A. poplitea (Asterisk) Abb. 2 8 Präoperative postrepositionelle MRT-Diagnostik:a sagittale Schnittgebungmit 1 Rupturdes vorderen Kreuzbandes, 2 femoralem Ausriss des hinteren Kreuzbandes und 3 inkompletter Ruptur des M. gastrocnemius, b koronare Schnittgebung mit 4 kompletter Ruptur des lateralen Kollateralbandes und 5 inkompletter Ruptur des medialen Kollateralbandes Knie Journal 1