To describe personal factors in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) and 2 control groups and to explore how such factors were associated with postconcussion symptoms (PCSs). Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Level 1 trauma center and outpatient clinic. Participants: Participants (NZ541) included patients with MTBI (nZ378), trauma controls (nZ82), and community controls (nZ81). Main Outcome Measures: Data on preinjury health and work status, personality, resilience, attention deficit/hyperactivity, and substance use. Computed tomography (CT) findings and posttraumatic amnesia were recorded. Symptoms were assessed at 3 months with the British Columbia Postconcussion Symptom Inventory and labeled as PCSþ if !3 symptoms were reported or the total score was !13. Predictive models were fitted with penalized logistic regression using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) in the MTBI group, and model fit was assessed with optimism-corrected area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: There were few differences in personal factors between the MTBI group and the 2 control groups without MTBI. Rates of PCSþ were 20.8% for the MTBI group, 8.0% for trauma controls, and 1.3% for community controls. In the MTBI group, there were differences between the PCSþ and PCSÀ group on most personal factors and injury-related variables in univariable comparisons. In the lasso models, the optimismcorrected AUC for the full model was 0.79, 0.73 for the model only including personal factors, and 0.63 for the model only including injury variables. Working less than full time before injury, having preinjury pain and poor sleep quality, and being female were among the selected predictors, but also resilience and some personality traits contributed in the model. Intracranial abnormalities on CT were also a risk factor for PCS. Conclusions: Personal factors convey important prognostic information in patients with MTBI. A vulnerable work status and preinjury health problems might indicate a need for follow-up and targeted interventions.
To investigate whether cognitive reserve moderates differences in cognitive functioning between patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) and controls without MTBI and to examine whether patients with postconcussion syndrome have lower cognitive functioning than patients without postconcussion syndrome at 2 weeks and 3 months after injury. Design: Trondheim MTBI follow-up study is a longitudinal controlled cohort study with cognitive assessments 2 weeks and 3 months after injury. Setting: Recruitment at a level 1 trauma center and at a general practitioner-run, outpatient clinic. Participants: Patients with MTBI (nZ160) according to the World Health Organization criteria, trauma controls (nZ71), and community controls (nZ79) (NZ310). Main Outcome Measures: A cognitive composite score was used as outcome measure. The Vocabulary subtest was used as a proxy of cognitive reserve. Postconcussion syndrome diagnosis was assessed at 3 months with the British Columbia Postconcussion Symptom Inventory. Results: Linear mixed models demonstrated that the effect of vocabulary scores on the cognitive composite scores was larger in patients with MTBI than in community controls at 2 weeks and at 3 months after injury (PZ.001). Thus, group differences in the cognitive composite score varied as a function of vocabulary scores, with the biggest differences seen among participants with lower vocabulary scores. There were no significant differences in the cognitive composite score between patients with (nZ29) and without (nZ131) postconcussion syndrome at 2 weeks or 3 months after injury. Conclusion: Cognitive reserve, but not postconcussion syndrome, was associated with cognitive outcome after MTBI. This supports the cognitive reserve hypothesis in the MTBI context and suggests that persons with low cognitive reserve are morevulnerable to reduced cognitive functioning if they sustain an MTBI.
Personally relevant visual stimuli may minimize the risk of missing visual fixation, compared with the neutral stimuli used in the current gold standard behavioural assessment measure (CRS-R). However, due to the single-subject design this conclusion is tentative and more research is needed.
Objective: To investigate (a) whether self-reported cognitive symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) are associated with cognitive test performances, and (b) whether improvement in self-reported symptoms from 2 weeks to 3 months after MTBI is associated with improvement in cognitive test performances. Method: Patients with MTBI (n ϭ 135), aged 16 -59, who initially presented to the emergency department, completed the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), the Brief Symptom Inventory 18, and cognitive tests (i.e., Controlled Oral Word Association, Coding, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning, and Trail Making test) at 2 weeks and 3 months after MTBI. Using Spearman's rank correlations (), associations were examined between self-report measures and cognitive test performances at each time point and between change scores (i.e., 3-month score minus 2-week score) on each outcome. Results: At 3 months, 27% reported cognitive symptoms to some extent. At both assessments, greater severity of RPQ cognitive symptoms was very weakly associated with worse cognitive test performances (2-week range ϭ Ϫ0.19 to Ϫ0.01; 3-month range ϭ Ϫ0.20 to Ϫ0.10). RPQ cognitive symptoms were, however, strongly related to greater somatic and emotional symptoms. Change in self-reported cognitive symptoms from 2 weeks to 3 months was not associated with change in cognitive test performance. In contrast, change in self-reported cognitive symptoms was strongly associated with change in emotional ( ϭ 0.58) and somatic symptoms ( ϭ 0.57). Conclusions: These
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.