No abstract

Prasugrel and ticagrelor exhibit greater platelet inhibition and superior efficacy compared with clopidogrel, at the expense of higher bleeding risk. Prasugrel and ticagrelor should be preferred over clopidogrel in patients who are at a high risk of thrombotic events with low risk of bleeding. Additionally, these two agents may offer advantage over clopidogrel in those patients who might have risk for drug resistance due to CYP2C19 polymorphism. In selecting the ideal agent for patients, clinicians should tailor the antiplatelet regimen by considering individual risk factors and medication characteristics.

As a result of the multimechanistic pathology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), combination therapy is emerging as a potential treatment option. Recent guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians and expert consensus from the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association do not definitively support or disapprove of combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of PAH. Published trials have investigated different combinations including endothelin receptor antagonists with prostanoids, prostanoids with phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors with endothelin receptor antagonists. Pertinent trials on combination pharmacotherapy for PAH were identified through a MEDLINE search of literature from 1967-2009 in addition to a manual search of references from the articles retrieved. Search results identified 12 trials that evaluated combination therapy for PAH; some included an add-on agent for patients who failed treatment with monotherapy and others were placebo controlled. Even with the published data, the overall consensus is unclear. Well-designed, larger trials with validated end points are needed to further identify when to initiate combination therapy for the treatment of PAH. Meanwhile, perhaps the most appropriate situation for using combination pharmacotherapy may be in the setting of a lack of clinical improvement or deterioration.

Purpose: There have been 3 published reports (4 cases) of symptomatic sinus bradycardia occurring after intravenous (IV) administration of the selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT 3 ) receptor antagonist ondansetron. We report a fifth case in which the patient developed asystole after rechallenge with ondansetron. Summary: A 36-year-old pregnant patient with no cardiac history, status post cerclage for cervical insufficiency, experienced nausea in the post ambulatory care unit after administration of morphine and indomethacin for pain. After IV administration of ondansetron, the patient's heart rate decreased to the 40s and improved spontaneously. The patient experienced a second episode of nausea, another dose of ondansetron was administered, and the patient went into asystole. Advanced cardiac life support measures were initiated and chest compressions were conducted for 3 minutes with return of spontaneous circulation. The patient was monitored overnight with no development of new cardiac arrhythmias and was discharged from the hospital in stable condition. Conclusions: Sinus bradycardia after IV administration of ondansetron was observed in a 36-year-old pregnant patient status post cerclage. On rechallenge, the patient went into asystole. This case report adds to the available literature regarding ondansetron-induced cardiac arrhythmias and the possibility of asystole upon rechallenge.