The increased availability and use of DNA microarrays has allowed the characterization of gene expression patterns associated with exposure to different toxicants. An important question is whether toxicant induced changes in gene expression in fish are sufficiently diverse to allow for identification of specific modes of action and/or specific contaminants. In theory, each class of toxicant may generate a gene expression profile unique to its mode of toxic action. In this study, isogenic (cloned) rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss were exposed to sublethal levels of a series of model toxicants with varying modes of action, including ethynylestradiol (xeno-estrogen), 2,2,4,4'-tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-47, thyroid active), diquat (oxidant stressor), chromium VI, and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) for a period of 1-3 weeks. An additional experiment measured trenbolone (anabolic steroid; model androgen) induced gene expression changes in sexually mature female trout. Following exposure, fish were euthanized, livers removed and RNA extracted. Fluorescently labeled cDNA were generated and hybridized against a commercially available Atlantic Salmon/Trout array (GRASP project, University of Victoria) spotted with 16,000 cDNA's. The slides were scanned to measure abundance of a given transcript in each sample relative to controls. Data were analyzed via Genespring (Silicon Genetics) to identify a list of up- and downregulated genes, as well as to determine gene clustering patterns that can be used as "expression signatures". The results indicate each toxicant exposure caused between 64 and 222 genes to be significantly altered in expression. Most genes exhibiting altered expression responded to only one of the toxicants and relatively few were co-expressed in multiple treatments. For example, BaP and Diquat, both of which exert toxicity via oxidative stress, upregulated 28 of the same genes, of over 100 genes altered by either treatment. Other genes associated with steroidogenesis, p450 and estrogen responsive genes appear to be useful for selectively identifying toxicant mode of action in fish, suggesting a link between gene expression profile and mode of toxicity. Our array results showed good agreement with quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT PCR), which demonstrates that the arrays are an accurate measure of gene expression. The specificity of the gene expression profile in response to a model toxicant, the link between genes with altered expression and mode of toxic action, and the consistency between array and qRT PCR results all suggest that cDNA microarrays have the potential to screen environmental contaminants for biomarkers and mode of toxic action.

A two-probe proximal chaperone detection system consisting of a species-specific capture probe for the microarray and a labeled, proximal chaperone probe for detection was recently described for direct detection of intact rRNAs from environmental samples on oligonucleotide arrays. In this study, we investigated the physical spacing and nucleotide mismatch tolerance between capture and proximal chaperone detector probes that are required to achieve species-specific 16S rRNA detection for the dissimilatory metal and sulfate reducer 16S rRNAs. Microarray specificity was deduced by analyzing signal intensities across replicate microarrays with a statistical analysis-of-variance model that accommodates well-to-well and slide-to-slide variations in microarray signal intensity. Chaperone detector probes located in immediate proximity to the capture probe resulted in detectable, nonspecific binding of nontarget rRNA, presumably due to base-stacking effects. Species-specific rRNA detection was achieved by using a 22-nt capture probe and a 15-nt detector probe separated by 10 to 14 nt along the primary sequence. Chaperone detector probes with up to three mismatched nucleotides still resulted in species-specific capture of 16S rRNAs. There was no obvious relationship between position or number of mismatches and within-or between-genus hybridization specificity. From these results, we conclude that relieving secondary structure is of principal concern for the successful capture and detection of 16S rRNAs on planar surfaces but that the sequence of the capture probe is more important than relieving secondary structure for achieving specific hybridization.DNA microarrays are currently used for gene expression profiling (18, 25), DNA sequencing (24), disease screening (17), diagnostics (9, 29), and genotyping (14), usually within the context of clinical applications. The extension of microarray technology to the detection and analysis of 16S rRNAs in mixed microbial communities likewise holds tremendous potential for microbial community analysis, pathogen detection, and process monitoring in both basic and applied environmental sciences (7,12,27). The application of microarrays for unattended in-field or point-of-use environmental applications, however, frequently involves requirements to (i) detect many different microorganisms simultaneously, (ii) utilize a bioanalytical detection method that is conducive to automation and/or field deployment, (iii) monitor RNA as a qualitative indicator of microbial activity, and (iv) quantify RNA levels and/or the extent of microbial activity. Such requirements are especially pertinent for monitoring changes in microbial community composition and activity through time and space. Thus, continued use of microarray protocols that rely on PCR amplification represents a significant bottleneck for the routine application and deployment of microarrays in the field and highlights the need to develop sensitive and specific direct RNA detection methods for environmental samples.There are several rep...

No abstract

No abstract