(1) Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) penetrates the respiratory epithelium through angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) binding. Myocardial and endothelial expression of ACE2 could account for the growing body of reported evidence of myocardial injury in severe forms of Human Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to provide insight into the impact of troponin (hsTnI) elevation on SARS-CoV-2 outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. (2) Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of hospitalized adult patients with the SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to a university hospital in France. The observation period ended at hospital discharge. (3) Results: During the study period, 772 adult, symptomatic COVID-19 patients were hospitalized for more than 24 h in our institution, of whom 375 had a hsTnI measurement and were included in this analysis. The median age was 66 (55–74) years, and there were 67% of men. Overall, 205 (55%) patients were placed under mechanical ventilation and 90 (24%) died. A rise in hsTnI was noted in 34% of the cohort, whereas only three patients had acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and one case of myocarditis. Death occurred more frequently in patients with hsTnI elevation (HR 3.95, 95% CI 2.69–5.71). In the multivariate regression model, a rise in hsTnI was independently associated with mortality (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.49–6.65) as well as age ≥ 65 years old (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.45–7.18) and CRP ≥ 100 mg/L (OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.12–13.98). After performing a sensitivity analysis for the missing values of hsTnI, troponin elevation remained independently and significantly associated with death (OR 3.84, 95% CI 1.78–8.28). (4) Conclusion: Our study showed a four-fold increased risk of death in the case of a rise in hsTnI, underlining the prognostic value of troponin assessment in the COVID-19 context.
Antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies can arise transiently at times of viral diseases. The objective of this work was to evaluate the incidence of aPL antibodies in patients hospitalized in conventional unit for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and confirmed venous thromboembolic events (VTE) associated with aPL antibodies. 41 patients infected with COVID-19 were tested for aPL antibodies. None had reported history of aPL syndrome. Arterial and venous duplex ultrasound of lower limbs was performed in all patients at Day 0 and Day 5. All patients had antithrombotic-prophylaxis upon admission using lower molecular weight heparin with Enoxaparin. Biological parameters were collected and analyzed. Nine patients (22%) developed VTE and seven (17%) were positive for aPL antibodies of which five had isolated positive lupus anticoagulant. The sixth patient was double aPL positive IgM anticardiolipin (147.8 U/ml) and anti-Beta2 Glyco protein 1 (97.3 U/ml) antibodies. The seventh was triple positive, IgM anticardiolipin 85.6 UI/ml, IgM anti-Beta2 Glyco protein 1 63.0 U/ml and positive lupus anticoagulant. Among the seven patients with aPL antibodies 2 (28.60%) had VTE. However, the incidence of VTE in patients negative for aPL antibodies was also significant as 20.6% (seven of 34). aPL antibodies were significantly associated with the transfer to ICUs of, P = 0.018. Not only the incidence of aPL antibodies was quite significant within our cohort, but also we observed 28.6% of VTE in aPL-positive patients. We strongly recommend routine testing for aPL antibodies in COVID-19 patients and systematic screening with duplex ultrasound search of vascular complications.
Objective COVID-19 patients may develop coagulopathy which is associated with poor prognosis and high risk of thrombosis. The objective of this work was to evaluate the prevalence of deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs (DVT) through ultrasonography in patients infected with COVID-19 admitted to hospital in conventional units with 5 days monitoring. The secondary objective was to determine if D-dimer levels body mass index (BMI) and C-reactive ; protein (CRP) were associated with DVT. Materials and Methods 72 patients with a mean age of 65±12.3 years infected with COVID-19 were admitted to three conventional units at our institution ,28 patients were women. A COVID-19 diagnosis was made by transcriptase polymerase chain reaction by means of nasopharyngeal swab or by chest computer tomography (CT) without iodine contrast media. Demographics ,co-morbidities characteristics and laboratory parameters were collected . A preventive anticoagulation treatment was established on admission with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) . A complete venous duplex ultrasound (DU) test of lower limbs was performed on Day (D) 0 and D5 .A pulmonary CT angiograms with iodine contrast media (CTPA) was required when was ; suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). Results On D0 the DU showed acute DVT in seven patients (9.75%).A CTPA was performed in 12 patients (16.65%) ,3 of whom with an acute PE (25 %). On D0 acute DVT was not significantly associated with CRP (mean 101±98.6 in the group without DVT versus 67.6±58.4 mg/l p=0.43) or BMI ( 27.7 ±5.04 versus 28.1 ± 2.65 Kg/m2 p=0.54 ).However we found a significant association between acute DVT and D-dimer levels (1536±2347 versus 9652 ±10205 ng/ml p <0.01).Among the patients included on D0 only 32 had a DU on D5.Forty of them (55.55%) were not examined for the following reasons : 7 were previously diagnosed with VTE on D0 (9.7%) and therefore had been excluded on D5 8 (11%) had been transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) 10 (14%) discharged from the hospital 5 (7%) died and 10 ( 13.9%) due to technical issues. On D5 5 patients had acute DVT (15.6%) in addition to those found on D0 3 were distal and 2 proximal despite preventive anticoagulation with LMWH. Conclusions Hospitalized non ICU patients with COVID-19 pneumonia have a high frequency of venous thrombotic events justifying screening with duplex ultrasound.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.