Spectrum sensing and transmit notching is a form of cognitive radar that seeks to reduce mutual interference with other spectrum users in the same band. This concept is examined for the case where another spectrum user moves in frequency during the radar's CPI. The physical radar emission is based on a recent FM noise waveform possessing attributes that are inherently robust to sidelobes that otherwise arise for spectral notching. Due to increasing spectrum sharing with cellular communications, the interference considered takes the form of in-band OFDM signals that hop around the band. The interference is measured each PRI and a fast spectrum sensing algorithm determines where notches are required, thus facilitating a rapid response to dynamic interference. To demonstrate the practical feasibility and to understand the tradespace such a scheme entails, free-space experimental measurements based on notched radar waveforms are collected and synthetically combined with separately measured hopping interference under a variety of conditions to assess the efficacy of such an approach, including the impact of interference hopping during the radar CPI, latency in the spectrum sensing/waveform design process, notch tapering to reduce sidelobes, notch width modulation due to spectrum sensing, and the impact of digital up-sampling on notch depth.

No abstract

No abstract

We investigate three emerging topics essential for the development of cognitive radar (CR) for spectrum sharing: the response time (RT) of the CR, the autonomous regulation of the perception-action cycle (PAC), and the regulation of cognition. The RT measures the latency of all algorithms / hardware and is examined with respect to enabling capabilities of software-defined systems for rapid flexibility and responsiveness. The autonomous regulation of the PAC determines "how fast the CR can interact with the environment" as well as "how fast the CR should interact with the environment." The regulation of the PAC is explored with respect to pulse-to-pulse waveform agility to coexist successfully with dynamic radio frequency (RF) emitters in the ambient electromagnetic environment (EME) and the consequence of modifying the waveform within the coherent processing interval (CPI). Finally, the regulation of cognition determines how to select a particular CR technique appropriately for a given dynamic environment. This selection requires a high-level, or meta-decision process to identify the appropriate cognitive radar technique as the EME changes over time and we therefore concentrate discussion on the newly emerging topic for radar called metacognitive radar. The exploration of these three topics include a review of past and current research with discussion of possible future research.

No abstract