Dysphagia aortica commonly coexists with motility disorders and GORD. Video solid bolus swallow allowed us to determine the clinical significance of a manometric HPB in 4 out of 5 patients suspected on dysphagia aortica where standard evaluation would have failed. We recommend its use in those patients with a manometric HPB suggestive of dysphagia aortica in whom standard barium swallow is normal.

Failure of effective handover is a major preventable cause of patient harm. We aimed to promote accurate recording of high-quality clinical information using an Electronic Handover System (EHS) that would contribute to a sustainable improvement in effective patient care and safety. Within our hospital the human factors associated with poor communication were compromising patient care and unnecessarily increasing the workload of staff due to the poor quality of handovers. Only half of handovers were understood by the doctors expected to complete them, and more than half of our medical staff felt it posed a risk to patient safety. We created a standardised proforma for handovers that contained specific sub-headings, re-classified patient risk assessments, and aided escalation of care by adding prompts for verbal handover. Sources of miscommunication were removed, accountability for handovers provided, and tasks were re-organised to reduce the workload of staff. Long-term, three-month data showed that each sub-heading achieved at least 80% compliance (an average improvement of approximately 40% for the overall quality of handovers). This translated into 91% of handovers being subjectively clear to junior doctors. 87% of medical staff felt we had reduced a risk to patient safety and 80% felt it increased continuity of care. Without guidance, doctors omit key information required for effective handover. All organisations should consider implementing an electronic handover system as a viable, sustainable and safe solution to handover of care that allows patient safety to remain at the heart of the NHS.

No abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a critical skill for all regional anesthesiologists and pain physicians to help diagnose relevant complications related to routine practice and guide perioperative management. In an effort to inform the regional anesthesia and pain community as well as address a need for structured education and training, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Society (ASRA) commissioned this narrative review to provide recommendations for POCUS. The recommendations were written by content and educational experts and were approved by the guidelines committee and the Board of Directors of the ASRA. In part II of this two-part series, learning goals and objectives were identified and outlined for achieving competency in the use of POCUS, specifically, airway ultrasound, lung ultrasound, gastric ultrasound, the focus assessment with sonography for trauma exam, and focused cardiac ultrasound, in the perioperative and chronic pain setting. It also discusses barriers to POCUS education and training and proposes a list of educational resources. For each POCUS section, learning goals and specific skills were presented in the Indication, Acquisition, Interpretation, and Medical decision-making framework.

The objectives of this initiative were to produce nationally tested audit tools, to influence the content of national guidelines, and to enable performance indicators to be set for the clinical transfusion process. Audit tools were developed for blood transfusion practice through a collaboration between Royal Colleges and specialist Societies with an interest in blood transfusion. National audits were carried out involving 50 hospitals in the first audit and 23 of the same hospitals in the second. Over 20% of participating hospitals did not have Hospital Transfusion Committees. Most hospitals had written policies for the taking of blood samples for grouping and compatibility testing. Formal training for the phlebotomists and nurses who took blood samples was almost universal, but only one-third gave training to doctors. The audits of transfusion practice demonstrated considerable variation in the performance of standard procedures in relation to the administration of blood, and little change in practice between the two audits. The first two objectives have been met in that audit tools were developed and published, and information from the first audits was used in the development of national guidelines for the administration of blood. A significant shortfall in the systems for monitoring and delivering transfusions is present in many hospitals. This justifies pursuing the third objective but this will require a new initiative. The type of analysis and the method used for the presentation of audit data developed in this study may be useful for setting performance indicators for the clinical transfusion process.