Introduction: To improve the nutritional care and resource allocation of critically ill patients with severe
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), we described their characteristics, treatment
modalities and clinical outcomes, and compared their nutrition interventions against the American Society
for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) recommendations.
Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted in 5 tertiary hospitals in Singapore.
Characteristics, treatment modalities, clinical outcomes and nutrition interventions of critically ill patients
with SARS-CoV-2 who received enteral and parenteral nutrition were collected between January and
May 2020.
Results: Among the 83 critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2, 22 (28%) were obese, 45 (54%) had
hypertension, and 21 (25%) had diabetes. Neuromuscular blockade, prone therapy and dialysis were
applied in 70% (58), 47% (39) and 35% (29) of the patients, respectively. Refeeding hypophosphataemia
and hospital mortality occurred respectively in 6% (5) and 18% (15) of the critically ill patients with
SARS-CoV-2. Late enteral nutrition and cardiovascular comorbidities were associated with higher
hospital mortality (adjusted relative risk 9.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25–35.99; 6.30, 95%
CI 1.15–34.40, respectively). Prone therapy was not associated with a higher incidence of high gastric
residual volume (≥250mL). The minimum caloric (15kcal/kg) and protein (1.2g/kg) recommendations of
ASPEN were achieved in 54% (39) and 0% of the patients, respectively.
Conclusion: The high obesity prevalence and frequent usage of neuromuscular blockade, prone
therapy, and dialysis had considerable implications for the nutritional care of critically ill patients with
SARS-CoV-2. They also did not receive adequate calories and protein. More audits should be conducted
to refine nutritional interventions and guidelines for this ever-evolving disease.
Keywords: COVID-19, critical illness, energy intake, enteral nutrition, nutrition support, protein intake
Introduction: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in COVID-19 is associated with a high
mortality rate, though outcomes of the different lung compliance phenotypes are unclear. We aimed to
measure lung compliance and examine other factors associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients
with ARDS.
Methods: Adult patients with COVID-19 ARDS who required invasive mechanical ventilation at 8
hospitals in Singapore were prospectively enrolled. Factors associated with both mortality and differences
between high (<40mL/cm H2O) and low (<40mL/cm H2O) compliance were analysed.
Results: A total of 102 patients with COVID-19 who required invasive mechanical ventilation were
analysed; 15 (14.7%) did not survive. Non-survivors were older (median 70 years, interquartile
range [IQR] 67–75 versus median 61 years, IQR 52–66; P<0.01), and required a longer duration of
ventilation (26 days, IQR 12–27 vs 8 days, IQR 5–15; P<0.01) and intensive care unit support
(26 days, IQR 11–30 vs 11.5 days, IQR 7–17.3; P=0.01), with a higher incidence of acute kidney injury
(15 patients [100%] vs 40 patients [46%]; P<0.01). There were 67 patients who had lung compliance
data; 24 (35.8%) were classified as having high compliance and 43 (64.2%) as having low compliance.
Mortality was higher in patients with high compliance (33.3% vs 11.6%; P=0.03), and was associated
with a drop in compliance at day 7 (-9.3mL/cm H2O (IQR -4.5 to -15.4) vs 0.2mL/cm H2O (4.7 to -5.2)
P=0.04).
Conclusion: COVID-19 ARDS patients with higher compliance on the day of intubation and a
longitudinal decrease over time had a higher risk of death.
Keywords: ARDS, COVID-19-associated respiratory failure, high-flow nasal cannula therapy, HFNC,
post-intubation, ventilation strategies
Leiomyoma is a smooth muscle neoplasm that commonly occurs in the genitourinary system and the gastrointestinal tract of the body. Primary pulmonary leiomyoma is rarely reported in literature.We report a rare case of primary pulmonary leiomyoma of a 55‐year‐old male patient presenting with symptoms of cough for six months.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.