Midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons fire in 2 characteristic modes, tonic and phasic, which are thought to modulate distinct aspects of behavior. However, the inability to selectively disrupt these patterns of activity has hampered the precise definition of the function of these modes of signaling. Here, we addressed the role of phasic DA in learning and other DA-dependent behaviors by attenuating DA neuron burst firing and subsequent DA release, without altering tonic neural activity. Disruption of phasic DA was achieved by selective genetic inactivation of NMDA-type, ionotropic glutamate receptors in DA neurons. Disruption of phasic DA neuron activity impaired the acquisition of numerous conditioned behavioral responses, and dramatically attenuated learning about cues that predicted rewarding and aversive events while leaving many other DA-dependent behaviors unaffected.cue-dependent learning ͉ mouse behavior ͉ electrophysiology ͉ cyclic voltammetry D opamine (DA) neurons of the ventral midbrain project to the dorsal and ventral striatum, as well as to other corticolimbic structures such as the hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex. Differential DA release (tonic or phasic) is thought to activate distinct signal transduction cascades through the activation of postsynaptic inhibitory and excitatory G protein coupled receptors. Phasic DA is proposed to activate excitatory, low-affinity DA D1-like receptors (Rs) (1, 2) to facilitate long-term potentiation of excitatory synaptic transmission and enhance activity of the basal ganglia direct pathway facilitating appropriate action selection during goal-directed behavior. Conversely, tonic DA release is proposed to act on inhibitory, high-affinity DA D2Rs to facilitate long-term depression of cortico-striatal synapses and suppress activity of medium spiny neurons (MSNs) of the basal ganglia indirect pathway (1, 3-5). Thus, coordinate D1R and D2R activation modulates motor and cognitive function, and facilitates behavioral flexibility by a dichotomous control of striatal plasticity (5).During reinforcement learning shifts in phasic DA neuron responses from primary rewards, to reward predicting, stimuli are thought to reflect the acquisition of incentive salience for the predictive conditioned stimuli (6-10). Coincident DA and glutamate release onto MSNs during conditioned-stimulus response learning facilitates long-term potentiation of excitatory synapses that is thought to underlie reinforcement learning (1, 2, 11). Pharmacological or genetic disruption of D1R signaling impairs learning in numerous behavioral paradigms (2, 11); thus, phasic DA acting through D1R is thought to facilitate memory acquisition by ''stamping-in'' stimulus-response associations.Although considerable correlative electrophysiological evidence, as well as pharmacological and genetic evidence, supports an important role of phasic DA in stamping-in cue-reward associations, other evidence suggests that DA is not necessary for learning conditioned-stimulus responses. Mice genetically modified to...

Neurotransmission operates on a millisecond timescale, but is changed by normal experience or neuropathology over days, weeks or even months. Despite the great importance of long-term neurotransmitter dynamics, no technique exists to track these changes within a subject from day to day over extended periods of time. Here we describe and characterize a microsensor that can detect the neurotransmitter dopamine with subsecond temporal resolution over months in vivo in rats and mice.

Loss of dopamine in Parkinson's disease is hypothesized to impede movement by inducing hypo- and hyperactivity in striatal spiny projection neurons (SPNs) of the direct (dSPNs) and indirect (iSPNs) pathways in the basal ganglia, respectively. The opposite imbalance might underlie hyperkinetic abnormalities, such as dyskinesia caused by treatment of Parkinson's disease with the dopamine precursor L-DOPA. Here we monitored thousands of SPNs in behaving mice, before and after dopamine depletion and during L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Normally, intermingled clusters of dSPNs and iSPNs coactivated before movement. Dopamine depletion unbalanced SPN activity rates and disrupted the movement-encoding iSPN clusters. Matching their clinical efficacy, L-DOPA or agonism of the D dopamine receptor reversed these abnormalities more effectively than agonism of the D dopamine receptor. The opposite pathophysiology arose in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia, during which iSPNs showed hypoactivity and dSPNs showed unclustered hyperactivity. Therefore, both the spatiotemporal profiles and rates of SPN activity appear crucial to striatal function, and next-generation treatments for basal ganglia disorders should target both facets of striatal activity.