The proficiency test was conducted to assess the performance of the dosimetry audit service provider in the readout practice of the dose delivered to patients in medical institutions.Methods: A certain amount of the absorbed dose to water for the high-energy X-ray from the medical linear accelerator (LINAC) installed in the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) was delivered to the postal dose audit package given by the dosimetry audit service provider, in which the radio-photoluminescence (RPL) glass dosimeters were mounted. The dosimetry audit service provider read the RPL glass dosimeters and sent the readout dose value with its uncertainty to KRISS. The performance of the dosimetry audit service provider was evaluated based on the E n number given in ISO/IEC 17043:2010. Results:The evaluated E n number was −0.954. Based on the ISO/IEC 17043, the performance of the dosimetry service provider is "satisfactory."Conclusions: As part of the conformity assessment, the KRISS performed the proficiency test over the postal dose audit practice run by the dosimetry audit service provider. The proficiency test is in line with confirming the traceability of the medical institutions to the primary standard of absorbed dose to the water of the KRISS and ensuring the confidence of the dosimetry audit service provider.

We aim to develop a dose assessment method compensating for quality factors (Q factor) observed during in vivo EPR tooth dosimetry. A pseudo-in-vivo phantom made of tissue-equivalent material was equipped with one each of four extracted human central incisors. A range of Q factors was measured at tooth-depths of −2, 0, and 2 mm in the pseudo-in-vivo phantom. In addition, in vivo Q factors were measured from nine human volunteers. For the dose-response data, the above four sample teeth were irradiated at 0, 1, 2, 5, and 10 Gy, and the radiation-induced signals were measured at the same tooth-depths using an in vivo EPR tooth dosimetry system. To validate the method, the signals of two post-radiotherapy patients and three unirradiated volunteers were measured using the same system. The interquartile range of the Q factors measured in the pseudo-in-vivo phantom covered that observed from the human volunteers, which implied that the phantom represented the Q factor distribution of in vivo conditions. The dosimetric sensitivities and background signals were decreased as increasing the tooth-depth in the phantom due to the decrease in Q factors. By compensating for Q factors, the diverged dose-response data due to various Q factors were converged to improve the dosimetric accuracy in terms of the standard error of inverse prediction (SEIP). The Q factors of patient 1 and patient 2 were 98 and 64, respectively, while the three volunteers were 100, 92, and 99. The assessed doses of patient 1 and patient 2 were 2.73 and 12.53 Gy, respectively, while expecting 4.43 and 13.29 Gy, respectively. The assessed doses of the unirradiated volunteers were 0.53, 0.50, and − 0.22 Gy. We demonstrated that the suggested Q factor compensation could mitigate the uncertainty induced by the variation of Q factors.

No abstract