Background Kahoot! is a web-based technology quiz game in which teachers can design their own quizzes via provided game templates. The advantages of these games are their attractive interfaces, which contain stimulating music, moving pictures, and colorful, animated shapes to maintain students’ attentiveness while they perform the quizzes. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of Kahoot! compared with a traditional teaching approach as a tool to summarize the essential content of a medical school class in the aspects of final examination scores and the perception of students regarding aspects of their learning environment and of process management. Methods This study used an interrupted time series design, and retrospective data were collected from 85 medical students. Of these 85 students, 43 completed a Kahoot! quiz, while 42 students completed a paper quiz. All students attended a lecture on the topic of bone and joint infection and participated in a short case discussion. Students from both groups received the same content and study material, with the exception that at the end of the lesson, students in the Kahoot! group completed a quiz summarizing the essential content from the lecture, whereas the other group received a paper quiz with the same questions and the teacher provided an explanation after the students had finished. The students’ satisfaction was evaluated after the class, and their final examination was held 2 weeks after the class. Results The mean final examination score in the Kahoot! group was 62.84 (SD 8.79), compared to 60.81 (SD 9.25) in the control group (P=.30). The students’ satisfaction with the class environment, learning process management, and teacher were not significantly different between the 2 groups (all P>.05). Conclusions In this study, it was found that using Kahoot! as a tool to summarize the essential content in medical school classes involving a lecture and case discussion did not affect the students’ final examination scores or their satisfaction with the class environment, learning process management, or teacher.

Background Medical education in this era has been disturbed by coronavirus disease. Our faculty has quickly adapted the curricula to online formats. The online format seems to be more advantageous in terms of content material and virtual activities, but the results of these adjustments will require subsequent evaluation. The aim of this study was to evaluate medical student expectations of online orthopedics learning that was created based on social constructivism theory. Materials and methods A cross-sectional survey was carried out to assess the fifth-year medical student expectations of our newly developed online orthopedics course during the outbreak. Constructivist Online Learning Environment Survey (COLLES) was applied for evaluating the expectations during orthopedic rotation. The survey contains six aspects based on social constructivist principles: relevance, reflection, interactivity, tutor support, peer support, and interpretation. All students responded to the preferred COLLES before starting the online course, and the actual COLLES was filled out when the online course was completed. Before and after attending the online course, the scores were compared and interpreted to assess student expectations. Results A total of 126 fifth-year medical students studied the online orthopedic course. The preferred COLLES were completed by 125 students, while 120 students replied to the actual COLLES. The overall scores from the post-course survey in all aspects were significantly higher than scores from the pre-course with P -value < 0.01. The comparison between the preferred and actual scores showed this online course fulfilled student expectations. Conclusion The outbreak of coronavirus disease 19 has disrupted medical student education. The online orthopedic learning course in our department has been developed to deal with the current situation. Using the various activities based on social constructivism theory in the online platform was able to fulfill medical student expectations.

Background The flipped classroom (FC) is a well-known active learning module that activates the prior knowledge of students and promotes their cognitive skills during in-class activities. However, most on-site teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic had to be conducted online. The FC in our rehabilitation medicine clerkship curriculum was also shifted to online asynchronous lectures (OLs), without real-time interactions. There is no previous comparison of effectiveness between these two methods. Therefore, this study aimed to compare learning outcomes and student satisfaction in both FC and OL models. Methods The study design was a historically controlled study. A physical modality was chosen for the content. The FC group (n = 233), in the academic years 2018 and 2019, was assigned to perform a pre-class activity consisting of reading study materials. Thereafter, the in-class activity comprised a small-group case-based discussion. The OL group (n = 240) in the academic years 2020 and 2021 followed an online model during the COVID-19 lockdown. They were also asked to read the online materials and then watch a self-paced recorded lecture video on Learning Management Systems. The learning outcomes, including their multiple-choice questions (MCQs) scores, final exam scores, grade points, and letter grades, were evaluated. Their overall course satisfaction ratings were also collected. Results The OL group had an overall higher MCQ score for the physical modality portion than the FC group (p = 0.047). The median (lower quartile, upper quartile) of the total 50-MCQ scores were 34 (31, 37) in the OL group and 33 (29, 36) in the FC group (p = 0.007). The median final exam scores of the OL and FC groups were 69.5 and 68.3, respectively (p = 0.026). The median grade points and the letter grades were not significantly different between the groups. The proportions of satisfaction were significantly higher in the FC group than in the OL group. Conclusions The OL group revealed significantly higher learning outcomes than the FC group. However, the FC group showed more satisfaction with interactivity than the OL group. The authors are of the view that a combination of both FC and OL methods will likely result in better outcomes.

Objectives:We aimed to explore the relationship between web-based orthopedic illness scripts and medical students' performance as assessed through examination results. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study with 83 fifthyear medical students in an academic hospital. During a onemonth placement, they were instructed to do web-based illness scripts. Their performances were assessed by examination in the last week. All recorded data about illness scripts and examination results were retrieved. The students were separated into high and low response groups based on completed illness scripts. The characteristics of the students between the two groups were compared. Pearson correlation coefficients and regression analysis were used to identify the relationship between illness scripts and examination results. Results: There were 56 students in the high-response and 27 in the low-response groups. The characteristics and examination scores were not significantly different between the groups, while there was a significant difference in script completion (t(27)=13.72, p<0.001). Using Pearson correlation, we found weak correlations without significance between completed scripts, illness script scores, and examination scores. We found no relationship between illness script scores and examination scores, even in the high response group, by regression analysis. Conclusions: The use of web-based orthopedic illness scripts did not correlate to the examination performance of medical students. A high number of scripts without variety and limited time for practicing may have obscured potential positive relationships. Illness scripts should be adjusted as appropriate for each school before being assigned. A further multicenter, prospective study is suggested to identify the correlations and investigate the influencing factors.

BACKGROUND Kahoot is a web-based technology quiz game; wherein, teachers can design their own quizzes via provided game templates. The advantages of these games are their attractive interfaces, which have stimulating music, motion pictures and colorful, animated shapes to keep students attentiveness whilst performing the quizzes. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of using Kahoot as a tool to summarize the essential content in aspects of final examination scores, and the perception of students; in the aspects of his learning environment as well as to process management, compared with a traditional teaching approach. METHODS This study was a retrospective matched control study of 85 medical students. Forty-three students played Kahoot, while 42 students had a paper quiz. All students had a lecture, the topic being: bone and joint infection, and a short case discussion. Students from both groups had the same content and study material, with the exception being at the end of the lesson; wherein, students in the Kahoot group had a quiz; to summarize the essential content from the lecture; whereas, the other group had a paper quiz, with the same questions, and the teacher gave an explanation after students had finished. The students’ satisfaction was evaluated after the class, and their final examination was 2 weeks following the class. RESULTS The mean, final examination score in the Kahoot group was 62.84± 8.79, compared to 60.81± 9.25 in the control group (p= 0.3). Student’s satisfaction in class environment, learning process management and teacher were not significantly different between both groups (p >0.05). CONCLUSIONS This study found that using Kahoot as a tool to summarize the essential content in medical student classes which having a lecture and case discussion did not affect the final examination score, nor student satisfaction in class environment, learning process management and teacher.