Background— The long-term benefits of the maze procedure in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation undergoing mechanical valve replacement who already require lifelong anticoagulation remain unclear. Methods and Results— We evaluated adverse outcomes (death; thromboembolic events; composite of death, heart failure, or valve-related complications) in 569 patients with atrial fibrillation–associated valvular heart disease who underwent mechanical valve replacement with (n=317) or without (n=252) a concomitant maze procedure between 1999 and 2010. After adjustment for differences in baseline risk profiles, patients who had undergone the maze procedure were at similar risks of death (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.65–2.03; P =0.63) and the composite outcomes (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.50–1.34; P =0.42) but a significantly lower risk of thromboembolic events (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.73; P =0.008) compared with those who underwent valve replacement alone at a median follow-up of 63.6 months (range, 0.2–149.9 months). The effect of superior event-free survival by the concomitant maze procedure was notable in a low-risk EuroSCORE (0–3) subgroup ( P =0.049), but it was insignificant in a high-risk EuroSCORE (≥4) subgroup ( P =0.65). Furthermore, the combination of the maze procedure resulted in superior left ventricular ( P <0.001) and tricuspid valvular functions ( P <0.001) compared with valve replacement alone on echocardiographic assessments performed at a median of 52.7 months (range, 6.0–146.8 months) after surgery. Conclusion— Compared with valve replacement alone, the addition of the maze procedure was associated with a reduction in thromboembolic complications and improvements in hemodynamic performance in patients undergoing mechanical valve replacement, particularly in those with low risk of surgery.

Purpose: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract involvement in Crohn disease (CD) is rare and effectiveness of surgical treatment is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics and surgical outcomes of upper GI CD.Methods: Medical records of 811 patients who underwent intestinal surgery for CD between January 2006 and December 2015 at a single institution were reviewed. Upper GI CD was defined by involvement of the stomach to the fourth portion of duodenum, with or without concomitant small/large bowel CD involvement according to a modification of the Montreal classification.Results: We identified 24 patients (21 males, 3 females) who underwent surgery for upper GI CD. The mean age at diagnosis was 27 ± 12 years, the mean age at surgery was 33 ± 11 years, and the mean duration of CD was 73.6 ± 56.6 months. Fifteen patients (62.5%) had history of previous perianal surgery. Ten patients (41.7%) had duodenal or gastric stricture and 14 patients (58.3%) had penetrating fistula; patients with fistula were significantly more likely to develop complications (57.1% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.035). One patient with stricture had surgical recurrence. In seven patients with fistula, fistula was related to previous anastomosis. Patients with fistula had significantly longer hospital stays than those with stricture (16 days vs. 11 days, P = 0.01).Conclusion: Upper GI CD is rare among CD types (2.96%). In patients with upper GI CD, penetrating fistula was associated with longer hospital stay and more complications.