Background: A small randomized controlled trial suggested that dabigatran may be as effective as warfarin in the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). We aimed to compare direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin in a real-world CVT cohort. Methods: This multicenter international retrospective study (United States, Europe, New Zealand) included consecutive patients with CVT treated with oral anticoagulation from January 2015 to December 2020. We abstracted demographics and CVT risk factors, hypercoagulable labs, baseline imaging data, and clinical and radiological outcomes from medical records. We used adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox-regression models to compare recurrent cerebral or systemic venous thrombosis, death, and major hemorrhage in patients treated with warfarin versus DOACs. We performed adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression to compare recanalization rates on follow-up imaging across the 2 treatments groups. Results: Among 1025 CVT patients across 27 centers, 845 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 44.8 years, 64.7% were women; 33.0% received DOAC only, 51.8% received warfarin only, and 15.1% received both treatments at different times. During a median follow-up of 345 (interquartile range, 140–720) days, there were 5.68 recurrent venous thrombosis, 3.77 major hemorrhages, and 1.84 deaths per 100 patient-years. Among 525 patients who met recanalization analysis inclusion criteria, 36.6% had complete, 48.2% had partial, and 15.2% had no recanalization. When compared with warfarin, DOAC treatment was associated with similar risk of recurrent venous thrombosis (aHR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.51–1.73]; P =0.84), death (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.22–2.76]; P =0.70), and rate of partial/complete recanalization (aOR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.48–1.73]; P =0.79), but a lower risk of major hemorrhage (aHR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.15–0.82]; P =0.02). Conclusions: In patients with CVT, treatment with DOACs was associated with similar clinical and radiographic outcomes and favorable safety profile when compared with warfarin treatment. Our findings need confirmation by large prospective or randomized studies.

Objective Considerable attention has been devoted to understanding development of the auditory system during the first few years of life, yet comparatively little is known about maturation during adolescence. Moreover, the few studies investigating auditory system maturation in late childhood have employed a cross-sectional approach. Methods To better understand auditory development in adolescence, we used a longitudinal design to measure the subcortical encoding of speech syllables in 74 adolescents at four time points from ages 14 through 17. Results We find a developmental decrease in the spectral representation of the evoking syllable, trial-by-trial response consistency, and tracking of the amplitude envelope, while timing of the evoked response appears to be stable over this age range. Conclusions These longitudinal data provide further evidence that subcortical auditory development is a protracted process that continues throughout the first two decades of life. Specifically, our data suggest that adolescence represents a transitional point between the enhanced response during childhood and the mature, though smaller, response of adults. Significance That the auditory brainstem has not fully matured by the end of adolescence suggests that auditory enrichment begun later in childhood could lead to enhancements in auditory brainstem function and alter developmental profiles.

Our purpose was to determine the relative contribution of the antifactor Xa and antithrombin activities of heparin to its antithrombotic potency. The antithrombotic activities of unfractionated heparin (UH), two low molecular weight heparins (LMWH, CY 216 and CY 222) with increasing anti-factor Xa/antithrombin ratio and a synthetic pentasaccharide (PS) with high affinity to antithrombin III and no antithrombin activity were evaluated. In the Wessler-thromboplastin model, the most potent antithrombotic agent, on a weight basis, was UH followed by CY 216, CY 222 and the PS which was 40 times less potent than UH. On an antithrombin unit basis, the antithrombotic potencies of UH, CY 216 and of CY 222 were equivalent. Thus, in this model, the antithrombotic effect results from the catalytic action of UH or LMWH on thrombin inhibition. In the Wessler-serum model, on a weight basis, the antithrombotic effectiveness of UH was unchanged, those of CY 216 and CY 222 were doubled, and that of the PS was increased 10 times. On an anti-factor Xa unit basis, CY 216 was as effective as UH, and PS as effective as CY 222. On an antithrombin unit basis, CY 216 and CY 222 were equivalent and more potent than UH. Thus, in this model, the antifactor Xa activity of heparin becomes important for its antithrombotic property. After a single subcutaneous injection of 1000 antifactor Xa U/kg, the antithrombotic effects of UH were maintained for more than 14 h in the two models. After injection of the same dose of CY 216 significant antithrombotic effects were observed only for 9 h, in the Wessler-thromboplastin model but for 18 h in the Wessler-serum model. At that time, no detectable antithrombin activity was measurable in the plasma while 0.11 units of antifactor Xa activity/ml was detected. Thus, the relative contribution of the anti-factor Xa and antithrombin activities to the antithrombotic effect of a LMWH differs according to the nature of the thrombogenic stimulus.

No abstract

No abstract