Background The number of Canadian gastroenterologists has been on the rise in the last 20 years but female representation has stayed disproportionately low (30%). Gastroenterology has remained a male dominated subspecialty despite research showing as early as 1990’s that systemic gender-based barriers exist. Aims To determine whether GI career profiles differ between male and female gastroenterologists and understand barriers to career advancement related to gender in order to help shape future interventions to counteract these issues. Methods A 51-question survey was disseminated to gastroenterologists practicing in Canada. Using provincial College of Physicians and Surgeons websites, an electronic survey was sent to GIs with email addresses and a paper copy to those with fax numbers. The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology sent our survey link in their September 2019 membership email. The survey included questions pertaining to personal, professional, financial and practice characteristics of participants. Data was analyzed using SAS statistical program, and descriptive analysis with 95% confidence intervals was used to compare proportions of men and women. Nonparametric tests were used for continuous data. Qualitative thematic analysis was applied for short answer responses. Results Total 98 responses received (14.7% response rate) with 35% female respondents. Majority had adult, urban practices (86%) but males reported significantly more endoscopy time (42% v. 30%) vs. females who spent more time on research (23% v. 10%). Men were more likely to be married and have children than females. Women were more likely to not only have to choose between their marriage and their career, but more chose marriage compared to men specifically taking time off for maternity or childcare needs. Men were more likely to leave childcare predominantly to their spouse whereas women were more likely to share responsibility of childcare with spouse and hired help. Even after adjusting for age, males earned a significantly higher income than females (>$100,000 difference). 40% of men reported a salary over $600,000, compared to only 4% of women. Several gender-based biases were cited by females during their staff GI career: receiving less recognition for their work, challenging relationships with senior colleagues and support staff, inferior promotion opportunity, more difficulty publishing research and having their competency challenged by peers. Conclusions This survey shows that there are still many differences in the Canadian GI career pathway experience based on gender. Female GIs are disproportionately negatively affected in their clinical and academic practices, renumeration and work-life balance. Understanding these disparities is the first step towards remedying gender inequality in GI workplace culture. Funding Agencies None

Background To determine representation of women in gastroenterology (GI) at residency and leadership levels in Canada. Methods The Canadian Resident Matching Service provided data for internal medicine (IM), general surgery (GS), GI and cardiology applicant cycles 2014 to 2018. Z-tests were used to compare proportion of women entering each residency program. An internet search was conducted to calculate percentages of women as GI association presidents, residency program directors, division heads and oral speakers at conferences. Results IM residency had on average of 1789 applicants with 487 matched (49.4% versus 49.5% women). GS residency had on average 357 applicants with 90 matched (41% versus 54.4% women). GI residency had on average 46 applicants with 34 matched (37% versus 35.3% women). Cardiology residency had on average 76 applicants with 54 matched (29% versus 27.8% women). The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) has had two out of 47 (4.2%) women presidents. The Ontario Association of Gastroenterology (OAG) has had no women presidents (0/9). The Association des gastro-entérologues du Québec (AGEQ) has had two out of 15 (13%) women presidents. The Alberta Society of Gastroenterology (ASG) has had one out of five (20%) women presidents. From 2018 to 2020, university division heads ranged from 0% to 13.3% women (0 to 2/15). University GI training program directors ranged from 28.6% to 35.7% (4 to 5/14). Women speakers at CAG’s annual conference varied 27% to 42% from 2016 to 2020, averaging 32.7%. Women speakers at OAG’s, AGEQ’s and ASG’s annual conferences averaged 23.3%, 24.1% and 35%, respectively. Conclusion Women gastroenterologists display low representation at multiple levels along the GI career pathway.

Background We aimed to determine the persistence of differential career experiences between male and female gastroenterologists in Canada >20 years after they were first noted in the literature. Methods A 51-question mixed-methods survey was developed focusing on personal, professional and financial characteristics. The survey was disseminated via email and fax to practicing gastroenterologists using provincial college registries and the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. Numerical data were analyzed using the chi-square test. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted for short answer responses. Findings There were a total of 114 responses (17% response rate) with 35% female respondents. Mean age was 49 years for males and 41 years for females (P = 0.001). Clinical practice types included general GI (63%), urban (82%) and academic (51%). Males reported more endoscopy time (P = 0.001) versus females who spent more time on research (P < 0.001). Men were more likely to be married (P = 0.011), but women were more likely to be responsible for childcare (P = 0.016). Women were more likely to choose between marriage and career and more chose marriage compared to men (P = 0.045). Males earned >$100,000/year higher income than females even when offset by age and work hours (P = 0.048). A salary >$600,000 was reported by 32% of men, compared to 3% of women. Female gastroenterologists reported less mentorship during GI training, challenging relationships with support staff, reduced promotion opportunity, more difficulty publishing and having their competency challenged. Interpretation Compared to previous data, there has not been significant gender-related progress in the past two decades regarding female gastroenterologists’ clinical practices, remuneration and work-life balance.

No abstract

No abstract