Background In recent years, conventional colorectal resection and its aftercare have increasingly become replaced by laparoscopic surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways, respectively.Objective To ascertain whether combining laparoscopy and ERAS have additional value within colorectal surgery.MethodsA systematic review with meta-analysis was performed with two primary research questions; does laparoscopy offer an advantage when all patients receive ERAS perioperative care and does ERAS offer advantages in a laparoscopically operated patient population. All randomised and controlled clinical trials were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases.ResultsPrimary search resulted in 319 hits. After inclusion criteria were applied, three RCTs and six CCTs were included in the meta-analysis. For laparoscopically operated patients with/without ERAS, no differences in morbidity were found and postoperative hospital stay favoured ERAS (MD −2.34 [−3.77, −0.91], Z = 3.20, p = 0.001). When comparing laparoscopy and open surgery within ERAS, major morbidity was significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group (OR 0.42 [0.26, 0.66], Z = 3.73, p = 0.006). Other outcome parameters showed no differences. Quality of included studies was considered moderate to poor overall with small sample sizes.ConclusionWhen laparoscopy and ERAS are combined, major morbidity and hospital stay are reduced. The reduction in morbidity seems to be due to laparoscopy rather than ERAS, so laparoscopy by itself offers independent advantages beyond ERAS care. Quality of included studies was moderate to poor, so conclusions should be regarded with some reservations.
Purpose Patella alta is a risk factor for patellofemoral pain and instability. Several measurement methods and imaging modalities are in use to measure patellar height. The first aim of this study was to determine the intra-and interrater reliability of different patellar height measurement methods on conventional radiography (CR), CT and MRI. The second aim was to examine the applicability of patellar height measurement methods originally designed for CR on CT and MRI. Methods Forty-eight patients who were treated for patellar instability were included. All patients had undergone a pre-operative conventional radiograph, CT scan and MRI. Five methods for measuring patellar height were performed on radiographs, CT and MRI by four observers. For each measurement, the intra-and interrater reliability was determined by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A Bland-Altman analysis was performed for measurements with an ICC ≥ 0.70. ResultsThe Insall-Salvati (IS) ratio was the only measurement that showed good intra-and inter-observer reliability on CR, CT and MRI. The intra-and inter-observer reliability of the patellotrochlear index (PTI) for MRI was good to excellent for all observers. The IS ratio showed a moderate to good reliability for comparison of all three imaging modalities with the best agreement between radiography and MRI. The other patellar height measurements showed only poor to moderate inter-method agreement. Conclusion In this study, the Insall-Salvati ratio shows better intra-and inter-observer reliability than the Blackburne-Peel ratio, the Caton-Deschamps ratio and the modified Insall-Salvati ratio on all imaging modalities. Radiography and CT seem to have better reliability than MRI. The patellotrochlear index, however, shows good inter-and intra-observer reliability on MRI. Only for the IS method was there acceptable agreement between CR and MRI. This means that the established Insall-Salvati normal values could be used for MRI as well. This study shows that the most reliable method to measure patella height is the Insall-Salvati ratio measured on conventional radiographs or the patellotrochlear index on MRI. Level of evidence Level II diagnostic.
PurposeTrochleoplasty aims to restore patellar stability. Various techniques have been described and almost all authors report successful results. However, the procedure has a significant risk of complications. Purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to assess the rate of complications after the various techniques used for trochleoplasty procedures.Materials and methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Studies on patients with recurrent patellar instability treated with a trochleoplasty with or without additional procedure, and reported complications were included. The primary outcome was the rate of complications per technique. A meta-analysis was performed whenever three or more studies per surgical technique could be included.ResultsThe selection process resulted in 20 studies included for analysis. A lateral facet elevating trochlear osteotomy was reported by two studies, ten studies reported on a Bereiter trochleoplasty, five on a Dejour trochleoplasty, one on an arthroscopic technique, one on a ‘modified’ technique and one on a recession wedge trochleoplasty. Meta-analysis showed that proportion of recurrent dislocation was 0.04 (95% CI 0.02–0.07) for Bereiter trochleoplasty and 0.02 (95% CI 0–0.08) for Dejour trochleoplasty. These proportions were 0.06 (95% CI 0.02–0.13) and 0.09 (95% CI 0.03–0.27) for recurrent instability, 0.07 (95% CI 0.02–0.19) and 0.12 (95% CI 0.00–0.91) for patellofemoral osteoarthritis and 0.08 (95% CI 0.04–0.14) and 0.20 (95% CI 0.11–0.32) for further surgery respectively.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that the complications after a Bereiter and Dejour trochleoplasty including additional procedures are in the range of those of other patellar stabilizing procedures. For four other techniques, no meta-analysis could be performed. The clinical relevance of this study is that it provides clinicians with the best currently available evidence on the rate of complications after trochleoplasty procedures. This can be helpful in the process of deciding whether or not to perform such a procedure, and can be used to better inform patients about the advantages and disadvantages of different trochleoplasty procedures.Level of evidenceLevel IV.
Introduction In patients with recurrent patellar dislocations, a tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) can be indicated to correct patella alta or an increased trochlear groove-tibial tubercle distance. Several surgical techniques are described. Previous studies emphasize that detaching osteotomies results in devascularisation, which can lead to non-union and tibial shaft fractures. The aim of this study was to report the complication rates directly related to the surgical technique of a V-shaped TTO, where the tubercle is completely released from its periosteum using a step-cut osteotomy. Methods The retrospective case series comprised a large cohort of 263 knees with patella alta in 203 patients who underwent a V-shaped TTO, with or without additional realignment procedures, between March 2004 and October 2017. Data were obtained from available patient files. Complications were defined as minor or major. Results Thirteen major complications were registered (4.9%) including two tibial fractures (0.75%) and one non-union (0.37%). Five complications (1.9%) were defined as minor. Removal of the screws because of irritation or pain was seen in 22 cases (8.2%). Conclusion A V-shaped TTO is a safe procedure. The presumed higher risk for tibial fractures or pseudo-arthrosis could not be confirmed.
Purpose and hypothesisTrochlear osteotomy is a rarely performed procedure, only indicated in selected cases. Due to its nature, it can potentially lead to cartilage damage and subsequent early osteoarthritis. Satisfactory short-term results from lateral condyle-elevating osteotomy have previously been reported. The long-term effects of this procedure on clinical outcomes, patellar stability and radiological osteoarthritis are reported here.MethodsSixteen patients (19 knees) with patellar instability due to trochlear dysplasia were included. An isolated lateral condyle-elevating trochlear osteotomy was performed between 1995 and 2002. All patients were re-examined at a minimum of 12-year follow-up. Three patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient underwent a patellofemoral arthroplasty 3 years post-operatively due to progressive osteoarthritis. Complete follow-up was therefore available in 12 patients (15 knees). Recurrent instability, VAS pain, WOMAC, Lysholm and Kujala scores were used as outcome measures. Radiological osteoarthritis was recorded using the Iwano and the Kellgren–Lawrence classifications. A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to test for repeated measures (pre-operative, 2-year and final follow-up), and Spearman’s correlation coefficient for relationships between osteoarthritis and functional scores.ResultsAt final follow-up, VAS pain showed a non-significant improvement from 52 to 25, and the median Kujala score was 78. Median Lysholm (54–71, p = 0.021) and WOMAC (78–96, p = 0.021) scores improved from the pre-operative assessment to final follow-up. There was no significant difference observed between clinical scores at the 2-year and final follow-up. Residual patellar instability was reported in four out of 15 knees. Three knees showed no patellofemoral osteoarthritis, eight knees had grade 1 and four knees grade 2. No correlation between VAS pain, Lysholm, WOMAC or Kujala scores and osteoarthritis could be identified (n.s.).ConclusionA stand-alone lateral condyle-elevating trochleoplasty results in the significant improvement of most clinical scores; however, when performed as a stand-alone procedure, it leads to a high percentage of residual instability. In contrast to general belief, the development of patellofemoral osteoarthritis at 12-year follow-up did not exceed the findings from other trochleoplasty case series.Level of evidenceCase series with no comparison group, Level IV.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.