In this proposal, a number of complication examples are presented to illustrate the concept and demonstrate its practical use. This management and classification system has already proven valuable in the documentation and analysis of complication data from a number of published clinical studies. Because of this new standardized assessment process, it facilitates the communication of complications between clinicians and researchers, and helps to develop clear definitions for specific orthopedic complications.

The lack of homogeneity among the published studies that we reviewed indicates that improvement in the reporting of complications in orthopaedic clinical trials is necessary. A standardized protocol for assessing and reporting complications should be developed and endorsed by professional organizations and, most importantly, by clinical investigators.

Machines that can learn and correct themselves already perform better than doctors at some tasks, says Jörg Goldhahn, but Vanessa Rampton and Giatgen A Spinas maintain that machines will never be able to replicate the inter-relational quality of the therapeutic nature of the doctor-patient relationship Jörg Goldhahn deputy head 1 , Vanessa Rampton Branco Weiss fellow 2 , Giatgen A Spinas emeritus professor 3

The use of patient-reported outcome questionnaires is recommended in studies of the orthopaedic field. Reliable, validated tools are necessary to ensure the comparability of results across different studies, centers, and countries. The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) is a widely accepted and commonly used outcome measure in the self-evaluation after distal radius fractures. The cross-cultural adaptation of PRWE was performed according to international guidelines, following prescribed six stages: translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, pre-testing, and submission of documentation. PRWE versions were achieved without any substantive difficulty in all seven languages. Cross-cultural adaptation aims "to attain semantic, idiomatic, experiential and conceptual equivalence between the source and target questionnaires". The present paper provides such adaptation of the PRWE in seven different languages, making this tool available for an additional nearly half a billion potential users.