The plant light-harvesting complex of photosystem II (LHC-II) collects and transmits solar energy for photosynthesis in chloroplast membranes and has essential roles in regulation of photosynthesis and in photoprotection. The 2.5 Å structure of pea LHC-II determined by X-ray crystallography of stacked two-dimensional crystals shows how membranes interact to form chloroplast grana, and reveals the mutual arrangement of 42 chlorophylls a and b, 12 carotenoids and six lipids in the LHC-II trimer. Spectral assignment of individual chlorophylls indicates the flow of energy in the complex and the mechanism of photoprotection in two close chlorophyll a-lutein pairs. We propose a simple mechanism for the xanthophyllrelated, slow component of nonphotochemical quenching in LHC-II, by which excess energy is transferred to a zeaxanthin replacing violaxanthin in its binding site, and dissipated as heat. Our structure shows the complex in a quenched state, which may be relevant for the rapid, pH-induced component of nonphotochemical quenching. The EMBO Journal (2005) 24, 919-928.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) signal primarily through G proteins or arrestins. Arrestin binding to GPCRs blocks G protein interaction and redirects signaling to numerous G proteinindependent pathways. Here we report the crystal structure of a constitutively active form of human rhodopsin bound to a pre-activated form of the mouse visual arrestin, determined by serial femtosecond X-ray laser crystallography. Together with extensive biochemical and mutagenesis data, the structure reveals an overall architecture of the rhodopsin-arrestin assembly, in which rhodopsin uses distinct structural elements, including TM7 and Helix 8 to recruit arrestin. Correspondingly, arrestin adopts the pre-activated conformation, with a ~20° rotation between the Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms § Correspondence to H. Eric Xu: Eric.Xu@vai.org. * These authors contributed equally.Contributions: Y.K. initiated the project, developed the expression and purification methods for rhodopsin-arrestin complex, and bulk-purified expression constructs and proteins used in LCP crystallization for the SFX method; X.E.Z. collected the synchrotron data, helped with the SFX data collection, processed the data, and solved the structures; X.G. expressed and purified rhodopsinarrestin complexes, characterized their binding and thermal stability, discovered the initial crystallization conditions with 9.7 MAG, prepared most crystals for synchrotron data collection, prepared all crystals for the final data collection by SFX, helped with SFX data collection, and established the initial cross-linking method for the rhodopsin-arrestin complex; Y.H. designed and performed Tango assays and disulfide bond cross-linking experiments; C.Z. developed the mammalian expression methods; P.W.dW helped with XFEL data processing and performed computational experiments; J.K., M.H.E.T., K. M. S-P., K. P., J. M., Y.J., X.Y.Z., and Q.C. performed cell culture, mutagenesis, protein purification, rhodopsin-arrestin binding experiments; W.L. and A.I. grew crystals and collected synchrotron data at APS and SFX data at LCLS, G.W.H. and Q.X. determined and validated the structure. Z.Z. and V.K. constructed the full model, the phosphorylated rhodopsin-arrestin model, and help writing the paper; D.W., S.L., D.J., C.K., Sh.B., and N.A. Z. helped with XFEL data collection and initial data analysis; S.B., M.M., and G.J.W. set up the XFEL experiment, performed the data collection, and commented on the paper. A.B., T.W., C.G., O.Y., and H.C. helped with XFEL data collection and data analysis, processed the data and helped with structure validation. G.M. W., B.P., and P.G. performed HDX experiments and helped with manuscript writing. J.L. helped initiate this collaborative project and with writing the paper. M.W. collected the 7.7 Å dataset at Swiss Light Source. A.M.,...

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest family of membrane proteins in the human genome and mediate cellular responses to an extensive array of hormones, neurotransmitters, and sensory stimuli. While some crystal structures have been determined for GPCRs, most are for modified forms, showing little basal activity, and are bound to inverse agonists or antagonists1. Consequently, these structures correspond to receptors in their inactive states. The visual pigment rhodopsin is the only GPCR for which structures exist that are thought to be in the active state2,3. However, these structures are for the apoprotein or opsin form that does not contain the agonist all-trans retinal. We present here a crystal structure for the constitutively active rhodopsin mutant E113Q4-6 in complex with a peptide derived from the C-terminus of the G protein transducin (the GαCT peptide). Importantly, the protein appears to be in an active conformation, and retinal is retained in the binding pocket after photoactivation. Comparison with the structure of ground state rhodopsin7 suggests how translocation of the retinal β-ionone ring leads to a rotational tilt of transmembrane helix 6 (TM6), the critical conformational change upon activation8. A key feature of this conformational change is a reorganization of water mediated hydrogen-bonding networks between the retinal-binding pocket and three of the most conserved GPCR sequence motifs. For the first time we thus show how an agonist ligand can activate its GPCR.

Bacteriorhodopsin (bR) is a light-driven proton pump and a model membrane transport protein. We used time-resolved serial femtosecond crystallography at an x-ray free electron laser to visualize conformational changes in bR from nanoseconds to milliseconds following photoactivation. An initially twisted retinal chromophore displaces a conserved tryptophan residue of transmembrane helix F on the cytoplasmic side of the protein while dislodging a key water molecule on the extracellular side. The resulting cascade of structural changes throughout the protein shows how motions are choreographed as bR transports protons uphill against a transmembrane concentration gradient.