SUMMARY Vpu proteins of pandemic HIV-1 M strains degrade the viral receptor CD4 and antagonize human tetherin to promote viral release and replication. We find that Vpus from SIVgsn, SIVmus and SIVmon infecting Cercopithecus primate species also degrade CD4 and antagonize tetherin. In contrast, SIVcpz, the immediate precursor of HIV-1, whose Vpu shares a common ancestry with SIVgsn/mus/mon Vpu, uses Nef rather than Vpu to counteract chimpanzee tetherin. Human tetherin, however, is resistant to Nef and thus poses a significant barrier to zoonotic transmission of SIVcpz to humans. Remarkably, Vpu from non-pandemic HIV-1 O strains are poor tetherin antagonists while those from the rare group N viruses do not degrade CD4. Thus, only HIV-1 M evolved a fully functional Vpu following the three independent cross-species transmissions that resulted in HIV-1 groups M, N, and O. This may explain why group M viruses are almost entirely responsible for the gobal HIV/AIDS pandemic.

Enveloped viruses escape infected cells by budding through limiting membranes. In the decade since the discovery that the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) recruits cellular ESCRT (endosomal sorting complexes required for transport) machinery to facilitate viral budding, this pathway has emerged as the major escape route for enveloped viruses. In cells, the ESCRT pathway catalyzes the analogous membrane fission events required for the abscission stage of cytokinesis and for a series of “reverse topology” vesiculation events. Studies of enveloped virus budding are therefore providing insights into the complex cellular mechanisms of cell division and membrane protein trafficking (and vice versa). Here, we review how viruses mimic cellular recruiting signals to usurp the ESCRT pathway, discuss mechanistic models for ESCRT pathway functions, and highlight important research frontiers.

Complex biological processes are often performed by self-organizing nanostructures comprising multiple classes of macromolecules, such as ribosomes (proteins and RNA) or enveloped viruses (proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids). Approaches have been developed for designing self-assembling structures consisting of either nucleic acids1,2 or proteins3–5, but strategies for engineering hybrid biological materials are only beginning to emerge6,7. Here, we describe the design of self-assembling protein nanocages that direct their own release from human cells inside small vesicles in a manner that resembles some viruses. We refer to these hybrid biomaterials as Enveloped Protein Nanocages (EPNs). Robust EPN biogenesis required protein sequence elements that encode three distinct functions: membrane binding, self-assembly, and recruitment of the Endosomal Sorting Complexes Required for Transport (ESCRT) machinery8. A variety of synthetic proteins with these functional elements induced EPN biogenesis, highlighting the modularity and generality of the design strategy. Biochemical and electron cryomicroscopic (cryo-EM) analyses revealed that one design, EPN-01, comprised small (~100 nm) vesicles containing multiple protein nanocages that closely matched the structure of the designed 60-subunit self-assembling scaffold9. EPNs that incorporated the vesicular stomatitis viral glycoprotein (VSV-G) could fuse with target cells and deliver their contents, thereby transferring cargoes from one cell to another. These studies show how proteins can be programmed to direct the formation of hybrid biological materials that perform complex tasks, and establish EPNs as a novel class of designed, modular, genetically-encoded nanomaterials that can transfer molecules between cells.

The antiviral protein tetherin/BST2/CD317/HM1.24 restricts cellular egress of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and of particles mimicking the Ebola virus (EBOV), a hemorrhagic fever virus. The HIV-1 viral protein U (Vpu) and the EBOV-glycoprotein (EBOV-GP) both inhibit tetherin. Here, we compared tetherin counteraction by EBOV-GP and Vpu. We found that EBOV-GP but not Vpu counteracted tetherin from different primate species, indicating that EBOV-GP and Vpu target tetherin differentially. Tetherin interacted with the GP2 subunit of EBOV-GP, which might encode the determinants for tetherin counteraction. Vpu reduced cell surface expression of tetherin while EBOV-GP did not, suggesting that both proteins employ different mechanisms to counteract tetherin. Finally, Marburg virus (MARV)-GP also inhibited tetherin and downregulated tetherin in a cell type-dependent fashion, indicating that tetherin antagonism depends on the cellular source of tetherin. Collectively, our results indicate that EBOV-GP counteracts tetherin by a novel mechanism and that tetherin inhibition is conserved between EBOV-GP and MARV-GP.

Background:The Vps4 ATPase powers the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) pathway. Results: Peptide binding to hexameric Vps4 is promoted by nucleotides that can mimic ADP, ATP, and the transition state. Conclusion: ESCRT-III substrates bind Vps4 MIT domains and then bind the central pore of an asymmetric, nucleotide-bound Vps4 hexamer. Significance: Mechanistic understanding of Vps4-substrate interactions is advanced by this work.