The human infection caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2 is a public health emergency of international concern. Although the disease associated to this virus, named COVID-19, mainly affects the lungs, the infection can spread to extrapulmonary tissues, causing multiorgan involvement in severely ill patients. The broad infective capacity of SARS-CoV-2 is related to the pattern of expression of the viral entry factors ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in human tissues. As such, the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts are at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection due to their high expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2, which explains the clinical phenotype described in the vast majority of infected patients that includes pneumonia and diarrhea. Recently, preoccupation about the potential of the virus to infect the skin has been raised by dermatologists due to the increasing observations of cutaneous manifestations in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although there is little evidence of the expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in the normal skin, the dermatological findings observed among COVID-19 patients warrants further investigation to delineate the mechanisms of skin affection after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here, we provide a summary of the dermatological findings observed among patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection based on recent reports. In addition, we analyze possible mechanisms of skin injury in COVID-19 patients and discuss about the risk of individuals with chronic skin conditions for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The present review constitutes a useful informative tool to improve our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of COVID-19 and the possible implications of the current pandemic in dermatology.

Objective. To compare the efficacy of 2 low-dose oral methotrexate (MTX) schedules in maintaining remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods. Patients with RA were included if they were receiving treatment with weekly MTX for at least 9 months and the RA was in remission (defined by American College of Rheumatology [ACR] criteria) for at least 6 months. Patients were stratified by treatment and randomly assigned to weekly or every-other-weekly (EOW; reducing their monthly dose by half) treatment with MTX. Patients were evaluated by a rheumatologist (blinded to the treatment schedule) at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 weeks. The evaluations included joint counts, Ritchie Articular Index, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, physician's and patient's global health assessments, visual analog scale for pain, and incidence of adverse effects. Laboratory evaluations were done at baseline and at week 24.Results. Fifty-one patients were included (26 taking weekly MTX, 25 taking EOW MTX). Baseline comparisons showed no differences between the groups. The mean duration of RA was <3 years in both groups, and they had been started on weekly MTX treatment early after diagnosis. After 24 weeks, >90% of the patients in both groups continued in remission. Evaluations of disease activity at 6 and 12 weeks showed no betweengroup differences. EOW MTX patients who experienced relapse were switched back to weekly MTX, and after a few weeks, their RA was again controlled. The incidence of adverse effects was slightly higher in the weekly MTX group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. The observed laboratory values were very similar for both groups, except for the serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels, which decreased in the EOW MTX group and were statistically significant at week 24 (P ‫؍‬ 0.04 and P ‫؍‬ 0.006, respectively).Conclusion. EOW MTX represents a valid therapeutic alternative for a specific subgroup of RA patients, as outlined by the ACR remission criteria. Patients with a short disease duration who were treated early after disease onset with weekly MTX and who achieve sustained remission have a higher probability of success with the EOW MTX schedule.

No abstract

No abstract