Background
Accumulating evidence has identified
Fusobacterium
as an important pathogenic gut bacterium associated with colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, only limited data exist about the role of this bacterium in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In this study, we quantified
Fusobacterium nucleatum
in untreated and post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) samples from LARC patients and investigated its association with therapy response and survival.
Patients and methods
A total of 254 samples from 143 patients with rectal adenocarcinomas were analyzed for the presence and abundance of
F. nucleatum
using RNA
in situ
hybridization and digital image analysis. Assay accuracy was determined using infected cell lines and tumor samples with available quantitative PCR data. We studied the impact of
F. nucleatum
load on pathologic complete response and relapse-free survival. Treatment-induced changes were evaluated in paired pre- and post-nCRT samples (
n
= 71). Finally, tumor microenvironment changes during nCRT were assessed in paired samples (
n
= 45) by immune contexture analysis.
Results
F. nucleatum
tissue levels by RNA
in situ
hybridization strongly correlated with quantitative PCR (
r
= 0.804,
P
< 0.001).
F. nucleatum
abundance was higher in untreated [median, 7.4; 95% confidence interval (3.7–16.2)] compared with treated [median, 1.6; 95% confidence interval (1.3–2.4)] tumors (
P
<0.001) with 58% (73/126) and 26% (22/85) positive tumors, respectively (
P
< 0.001). Baseline
F. nucleatum
levels were not associated with pathologic complete response.
F. nucleatum
positivity after nCRT, but not baseline status, significantly increased risk of relapse [hazard ratio = 7.5, 95% confidence interval (3.0–19.0);
P
< 0.001]. Tumors that turned
F. nucleatum-
negative after nCRT had a strong increase in CD8+ T cells post-nCRT (
P
< 0.001), while those that persisted
F. nucleatum
-positive after nCRT lacked CD8+ T cells induction in post-nCRT samples compared with baseline (
P
= 0.69).
Conclusion
F. nucleatum
persistence post-nCRT is associated with high relapse rates in LARC, potentially linked to suppression of immune cytotoxicity.
Purpose: The limited knowledge of the molecular alterations that characterize poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas has limited the clinical development of targeted agents directed to driver mutations. Here we aim to identify new molecular targets in colon neuroendocrine carcinomas (co-NEC) and proof the efficacy of matching drugs. Experimental Design: We performed a multi-omic analysis of co-NEC to identify genetic or epigenetic alterations that could be exploited as effective drug targets. We compared co-NEC samples with colorectal carcinomas (CRC) to identify neuroendocrinespecific traits. Patients with co-NEC and patient-derived xenografts were treated with a BRAFV600E-blocking drug to demonstrate sensitivity. Results: co-NEC and CRC are similar in their mutational repertoire, although co-NECs are particularly enriched in BRAFV600E mutations. We report for the first time that V600EBRAF-mutant co-NECs may benefit from BRAF inhibition in monotherapy and how EGFR status is essential to predict innate sensitivity and acquired resistance by a differential methylation of its gene regulatory regions. Conclusions: The identification of V600E BRAF mutations in high-grade co-NECs has allowed the description of radiological responses to combination therapy of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in basket clinical trials. However, the molecular rationale for this treatment combination was based on the presence of the BRAF mutation and the efficacy observed in other cancer types such as melanoma. Future drug development in this setting should test BRAF inhibitors upfront and the addition of anti-EGFR antibodies instead of MEK inhibitors for an efficient blockade of acquired resistance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.