OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS Many new occupational back-support exoskeletons have been developed in the past few years both as research prototypes and as commercial products. These devices are intended to reduce the risk of lowerback pain and injury for workers in various possible application sectors, including assembly in automotive and aerospace, logistics, construction, healthcare, and agriculture. This article describes the technologies adopted for back-support exoskeletons and discusses their advantages and drawbacks. Such an overview is intended to promote a common understanding and to encourage discussion among different stakeholders such as developers, ergonomics practitioners, customers, and workers. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: The large prevalence and risk of occupational lower-back pain and injury associated with manual material handling activities has raised interest in novel technical solutions. Wearable back-support exoskeletons promise to improve ergonomics by reducing the loading on the lumbar spine. Purpose: Since many new prototypes and products are being developed, this article presents an up-to-date overview of the different technologies. By discussing the corresponding advantages and drawbacks, the objective is to promote awareness and communication among developers, ergonomics practitioners, customers, and factory workers. Methods: The state-of-the-art is presented with a focus on three technological aspects: (i) the actuators generating assistive forces/torques, with a main distinction between passive and active devices; (ii) the structures and physical attachments that transfer those forces/torques to the user, with structures being soft, rigid, or a combination of the two; and (iii) the control strategies employed (i.e., how devices adjust assistive forces/torques to accommodate different activities and parameters). Discussion: The choice of actuation technology may determine the applicability of a device to different scenarios. Passive exoskeletons appear more suitable for tasks requiring relatively light assistance and little dynamic movements. By contrast, heavier and more dynamic tasks will justify the use of more complex active exoskeletons. While onboard battery power is increasingly present on active exoskeletons, the tradeoff between power autonomy and additional battery mass will probably depend on the

Heritage buildings usually have complex (non-parametric) geometries that turn their digitization through conventional methods in inaccurate and time-consuming processes. When it comes to the survey and representation of historical assets, remote sensing technologies have been playing key roles in the last few years: 3D laser scanning and photogrammetry surveys save time in the field, while proving to be extremely accurate at registering non-regular geometries of buildings. However, the efficient transformation of remote-sensing data into as-built parametric smart models is currently an unsolved challenge. A pragmatic and organized Historic Building Information Modeling (HBIM) methodology is essential in order to obtain a consistent model that can bring benefits and integrate conservation and restoration work. This article addresses the creation of an HBIM model of heritage assets using 3D laser scanning and photogrammetry. Our findings are illustrated in one case study: The Engine House Paços Reais in Lisbon. The paper first describes how and what measures should be taken to plan a careful scan-to-HBIM process. Second, the description of the remote-sensing survey campaign is conducted accordingly and is aimed at a BIM output, including the process of data alignment, cleaning, and merging. Finally, the HBIM modeling phase is described, based on point cloud data.

No abstract

It is necessary to determine if the tools used in the process of building performance calculation accurately reflect the real conditions, with the objective of introducing simulation in the design process of buildings. The aim of this study is the assessment of the effectiveness of the software ENVI-met v4 on the prediction of the thermodynamic performance of courtyards by means of comparing between field data obtained from simultaneous monitoring of three courtyards and the results obtained from the software simulations. The results of the study show a significant difference between monitored and simulated data for air temperature inside the courtyards. And the difference between outdoor temperature and courtyard temperature is too important not to be considered in building efficiency calculations. For that reason, ENVI-met it is not an accurate software to be used in the process of design of this kind of architectural transitional spaces that can be very important in order to design nZEB in some climates.